Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 3 |
Age Differences | 2 |
Gender Differences | 2 |
Racial Differences | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Adolescents | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Drinking | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ding, Kele | 1 |
Foorman, Barbara R. | 1 |
Gross, Paul R. | 1 |
Kershaw, Sarah | 1 |
Olds, R. Scott | 1 |
Petscher, Yaacov | 1 |
Thombs, Dennis L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 10 | 3 |
Grade 7 | 3 |
Grade 8 | 3 |
Grade 9 | 3 |
Grade 11 | 2 |
Grade 12 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Foorman, Barbara R.; Kershaw, Sarah; Petscher, Yaacov – Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, 2013
Florida requires that students who do not meet grade-level reading proficiency standards on the end-of-year state assessment (Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test, FCAT) receive intensive reading intervention. With the stakes so high, teachers and principals are interested in using screening or diagnostic assessments to identify students with a…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, At Risk Students, Reading Skills, Reading Difficulties
Ding, Kele; Olds, R. Scott; Thombs, Dennis L. – Journal of Drug Education, 2009
This retrospective case study assessed the influence of item non-response error on subsequent response to questionnaire items assessing adolescent alcohol and marijuana use. Post-hoc analyses were conducted on survey results obtained from 4,371 7th to 12th grade students in Ohio in 2005. A skip pattern design in a conventional questionnaire…
Descriptors: Substance Abuse, Marijuana, Measures (Individuals), Secondary School Students
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction