Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Learning Strategies | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Freehand Drawing | 1 |
| High School Students | 1 |
| Imagery | 1 |
| Learning Activities | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Pictorial Stimuli | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Learning and Instruction | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLeopold, Claudia; Leutner, Detlev – Learning and Instruction, 2012
The purpose of two experiments was to contrast instructions to generate drawings with two text-focused strategies--main idea selection (Exp. 1) and summarization (Exp. 2)--and to examine whether these strategies could help students learn from a chemistry science text. Both experiments followed a 2 x 2 design, with drawing strategy instructions…
Descriptors: Learning Strategies, Reading Comprehension, Freehand Drawing, Textbooks
Leopold, Claudia; Sumfleth, Elke; Leutner, Detlev – Learning and Instruction, 2013
The purpose of the experiment was to examine whether students better understand a science text when they are asked to self-generate summaries or to study predefined summaries. Furthermore, we tested the effects of verbal and pictorial summaries. The experiment followed a 2 x 2 design with representation mode (verbal vs. pictorial) and learning…
Descriptors: High School Students, Grade 10, Imagery, Transfer of Training
