Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 2 |
| Robotics | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Building Design | 1 |
| College Readiness | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Engineering | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Experimental Groups | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 2 |
| Grade 11 | 2 |
| Grade 12 | 2 |
| Grade 9 | 2 |
| High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkChung, C. J. ChanJin; Cartwright, Christopher; Cole, Matthew – Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 2014
Robotics competitions for K-12 students are popular, but are students really learning and improving their STEM scores through robotics competitions? If not, why not? If they are, how much more effective is learning through competitions than traditional classes? Is there room for improvement? What is the best robotics competition model to maximize…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Robotics, Competition, Teaching Methods
Download full textLawanto, Oenardi – National Center for Engineering and Technology Education, 2011
The objective of this study was to describe the task interpretation of students engaged in a design activity and determine the extent to which students translate their understanding of their design task to their planning and cognitive strategies. Twenty-nine students at one Colorado high school participated in this study. Students worked…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Engineering, Instructional Design, Building Design
