Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Adaptive Testing | 4 |
Grade 4 | 4 |
Test Validity | 4 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Mathematics Achievement | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Anderson, Daniel | 1 |
Benjamin G. Solomon | 1 |
Daro, Phil | 1 |
DeStefano, Lizanne | 1 |
Farley, Dan | 1 |
Forcht, Emily R. | 1 |
Kayla V. Campaña | 1 |
Linn, Robert | 1 |
Ortega, Moreica | 1 |
Stancavage, Frances | 1 |
Tindal, Gerald | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 4 | 4 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Van Norman, Ethan R.; Forcht, Emily R. – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2023
This study explored the validity of growth on two computer adaptive tests, Star Reading and Star Math, in explaining performance on an end-of-year achievement test for a sample of students in Grades 3 through 6. Results from quantile regression analyses indicate that growth on Star Reading explained a statistically significant amount of variance…
Descriptors: Test Validity, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Grade Prediction
Kayla V. Campaña; Benjamin G. Solomon – Assessment for Effective Intervention, 2025
The purpose of this study was to compare the classification accuracy of data produced by the previous year's end-of-year New York state assessment, a computer-adaptive diagnostic assessment ("i-Ready"), and the gating combination of both assessments to predict the rate of students passing the following year's end-of-year state assessment…
Descriptors: Accuracy, Classification, Diagnostic Tests, Adaptive Testing
Anderson, Daniel; Farley, Dan; Tindal, Gerald – Journal of Special Education, 2015
Students with significant cognitive disabilities present an assessment dilemma that centers on access and validity in large-scale testing programs. Typically, access is improved by eliminating construct-irrelevant barriers, while validity is improved, in part, through test standardization. In this article, one state's alternate assessment data…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Standardized Tests
Daro, Phil; Stancavage, Frances; Ortega, Moreica; DeStefano, Lizanne; Linn, Robert – American Institutes for Research, 2007
In Spring 2006,. the NAEP Validity Studies (NVS) Panel was asked by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) to undertake a validity study to examine the quality of the NAEP Mathematics Assessments at grades 4 and 8. Specifically, NCES asked the NVS Panel to address five questions: (1) Does the NAEP framework offer reasonable content…
Descriptors: National Competency Tests, Mathematics Achievement, Adaptive Testing, Quality Control