Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Automation | 2 |
Classification | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
At Risk Students | 1 |
Documentation | 1 |
Efficiency | 1 |
Essay Tests | 1 |
Evidence | 1 |
Feedback (Response) | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Grantee Submission | 2 |
Author
Afrin, Tazin | 1 |
Correnti, Richard | 1 |
Litman, Diane | 1 |
Matsumura, Lindsay C. | 1 |
Rodrigues, Jessica | 1 |
Wang, Elaine | 1 |
Wilson, Joshua | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Primary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wilson, Joshua; Rodrigues, Jessica – Grantee Submission, 2020
The present study leveraged advances in automated essay scoring (AES) technology to explore a proof of concept for a writing screener using the "Project Essay Grade" (PEG) program. First, the study investigated the extent to which an AES-scored multi-prompt writing screener accurately classified students as at risk of failing a Common…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Screening Tests, Classification, Accuracy
Afrin, Tazin; Wang, Elaine; Litman, Diane; Matsumura, Lindsay C.; Correnti, Richard – Grantee Submission, 2020
Automated writing evaluation systems can improve students' writing insofar as students attend to the feedback provided and revise their essay drafts in ways aligned with such feedback. Existing research on revision of argumentative writing in such systems, however, has focused on the types of revisions students make (e.g., surface vs. content)…
Descriptors: Writing (Composition), Persuasive Discourse, Revision (Written Composition), Documentation