Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 4 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Bayesian Statistics | 6 |
Comparative Analysis | 6 |
Elementary School Students | 4 |
Grade 5 | 4 |
Achievement Gains | 3 |
Progress Monitoring | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Age Differences | 2 |
Benchmarking | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Regional Educational… | 2 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Journal of Educational… | 1 |
Journal of Learning… | 1 |
Psychology in the Schools | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 5 | 6 |
Elementary Education | 5 |
Grade 4 | 4 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Intermediate Grades | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 10 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Florida | 2 |
Missouri | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Florida Comprehensive… | 2 |
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
SAT (College Admission Test) | 1 |
Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ali Alqarni – Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2025
This study examined the effect of gamification on visual programming and computational thinking skills among primary school students, aiming to investigate how gamified learning environments enhance cognitive skill development and conceptual integration compared to traditional teaching methods. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Game Based Learning, Achievement Tests, Teaching Methods
Carly Oddleifson; Stephen Kilgus; David A. Klingbeil; Alexander D. Latham; Jessica S. Kim; Ishan N. Vengurlekar – Grantee Submission, 2025
The purpose of this study was to conduct a conceptual replication of Pendergast et al.'s (2018) study that examined the diagnostic accuracy of a nomogram procedure, also known as a naive Bayesian approach. The specific naive Bayesian approach combined academic and social-emotional and behavioral (SEB) screening data to predict student performance…
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Accuracy, Social Emotional Learning, Diagnostic Tests
van der Sande, Lisa; Hendrickx, Marloes M. H. G.; Boor-Klip, Henrike J.; Mainhard, Tim – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2018
Although many studies have found that children with learning disabilities (LD) are less liked by peers than children without LD, the results are not unequivocal. In the present study, we investigated the social status (in terms of likeability and popularity) of children with LD by considering peer academic reputation and peer reputation of teacher…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Social Status, Reputation, Peer Relationship
Nelson, Peter M.; Van Norman, Ethan R.; Klingbeil, Dave A.; Parker, David C. – Psychology in the Schools, 2017
Although extensive research exists on the use of curriculum-based measures for progress monitoring, little is known about using computer adaptive tests (CATs) for progress-monitoring purposes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the frequency of data collection on individual and group growth estimates using a CAT. Data were…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Computer Assisted Testing, Data Collection, Scheduling
Petscher, Yaacov; Kershaw, Sarah; Koon, Sharon; Foorman, Barbara R. – Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, 2014
Districts and schools use progress monitoring to assess student progress, to identify students who fail to respond to intervention, and to further adapt instruction to student needs. Researchers and practitioners often use progress monitoring data to estimate student achievement growth (slope) and evaluate changes in performance over time for…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Achievement, Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students
Petscher, Yaacov; Kershaw, Sarah; Koon, Sharon; Foorman, Barbara R. – Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, 2014
Districts and schools use progress monitoring to assess student progress, to identify students who fail to respond to intervention, and to further adapt instruction to student needs. Researchers and practitioners often use progress monitoring data to estimate student achievement growth (slope) and evaluate changes in performance over time for…
Descriptors: Response to Intervention, Achievement Gains, High Stakes Tests, Prediction