Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Grade 6 | 2 |
| Metacognition | 2 |
| Multiple Regression Analysis | 2 |
| Protocol Analysis | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Reading Materials | 2 |
| Reading Strategies | 2 |
| Audio Equipment | 1 |
| Beliefs | 1 |
| Bilingual Students | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 5 | 2 |
| Grade 6 | 2 |
| Intermediate Grades | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Greece | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textBotsas, George – Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 2017
The aim of the study was to investigate differences in cognitive and metacognitive strategy use in the reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among students with learning disabilities (SLD) and without learning disabilities (SWOLD). A total of 122 fifth and sixth graders took part in the study. Half of them (n = 61) were SLD…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Strategies, Learning Disabilities, Cognitive Processes
Direct linkDavis, Dennis S.; Huang, Becky; Yi, Tanisha – Reading Research Quarterly, 2017
Previous research has identified various factors that contribute to readers' comprehension of expository texts, including strategy expertise, language proficiency, prior knowledge, and more recently, readers' beliefs about knowledge. This study addresses the need to understand the relative contributions of these predictors to readers'…
Descriptors: Middle School Students, Science Materials, Reading Materials, Reading Comprehension
