Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Error Patterns | 6 |
Middle School Students | 3 |
Spelling | 3 |
Age Differences | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Orthographic Symbols | 2 |
Word Recognition | 2 |
Alphabets | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Computation | 1 |
Computer Software | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Sciences: Theory… | 1 |
Journal of Speech, Language,… | 1 |
Mathematica Policy Research,… | 1 |
Reading & Writing Quarterly | 1 |
TESOL International Journal | 1 |
Thomas B. Fordham Foundation… | 1 |
Author
Bahr, Ruth Huntley | 1 |
Bear, Donald R. | 1 |
Berninger, Virginia W. | 1 |
Deke, John | 1 |
Dow, Michael | 1 |
Dragoset, Lisa | 1 |
Gross, Paul R. | 1 |
Guldenoglu, Birkan | 1 |
Hart, Sara | 1 |
Kargin, Tevhide | 1 |
Miller, Paul | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 3 | 6 |
Grade 4 | 6 |
Grade 7 | 6 |
Grade 8 | 6 |
Grade 2 | 5 |
Grade 5 | 5 |
Grade 6 | 5 |
Grade 1 | 4 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 9 | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
Gates MacGinitie Reading Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Wood, Carla L.; Schatschneider, Christopher; Hart, Sara – Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2020
This study aimed to describe 1-year changes in students' vocabulary in written narratives. Secondary aims included examination of accuracy and the relationship between lexical diversity and achievement. Participants included 749 students in first through eighth grades. Within-subjects 1-year change in diversity, productivity, and accuracy was…
Descriptors: Vocabulary Development, Elementary School Students, Middle School Students, Written Language
Bear, Donald R.; von Gillern, Sam; Xu, Wei – TESOL International Journal, 2018
This study investigates the English spelling of students in grades 2 through 8 in Mainland China. A review of spelling and cross-linguistic research in spelling is presented. The orthographic development of 273 students was assessed "with validated spelling inventories" (Sterbinsky, 2007) to sample developmental features across three…
Descriptors: Spelling, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Literacy Education
Guldenoglu, Birkan; Miller, Paul; Kargin, Tevhide – Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2014
The present study aimed to examine the relationship between letter processing and word processing skills in deaf and hearing readers. The participants were 105 students (51 of them hearing, 54 of them deaf) who were evenly and randomly recruited from two levels of education (primary = 3rd-4th graders; middle = 6th-7th graders). The students were…
Descriptors: Deafness, Middle School Students, Computer Software, Stimuli
Deke, John; Dragoset, Lisa – Mathematica Policy Research, Inc., 2012
The regression discontinuity design (RDD) has the potential to yield findings with causal validity approaching that of the randomized controlled trial (RCT). However, Schochet (2008a) estimated that, on average, an RDD study of an education intervention would need to include three to four times as many schools or students as an RCT to produce…
Descriptors: Research Design, Elementary Secondary Education, Regression (Statistics), Educational Research
Bahr, Ruth Huntley; Silliman, Elaine R.; Berninger, Virginia W.; Dow, Michael – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2012
Purpose: A mixed-methods approach, evaluating triple word-form theory, was used to describe linguistic patterns of misspellings. Method: Spelling errors were taken from narrative and expository writing samples provided by 888 typically developing students in Grades 1-9. Errors were coded by category (phonological, orthographic, and morphological)…
Descriptors: Language Patterns, Spelling, Mixed Methods Research, Expository Writing
Gross, Paul R. – Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute, 2005
The mission of this review is to appraise the new draft NAEP science framework and to determine whether it is up to snuff. This is an evaluation of the September 30, 2005, draft document, Science Framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress (Framework), developed for the National Assessment Governing Board. The criteria is…
Descriptors: Governing Boards, National Competency Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Science Instruction