Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| At Risk Students | 2 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Adaptive Testing | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Elementary School Students | 1 |
| Goodness of Fit | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 6 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
| Growth Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Grade 4 | 2 |
| Grade 6 | 2 |
| Grade 8 | 2 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
| Grade 7 | 1 |
| Intermediate Grades | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEthan R. Van Norman; Emily R. Forcht – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2024
This study evaluated the forecasting accuracy of trend estimation methods applied to time-series data from computer adaptive tests (CATs). Data were collected roughly once a month over the course of a school year. We evaluated the forecasting accuracy of two regression-based growth estimation methods (ordinary least squares and Theil-Sen). The…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity, Predictor Variables
Download full textAlonzo, Julie; Anderson, Daniel; Tindal, Gerald – Behavioral Research and Teaching, 2009
We present scaling outcomes for mathematics assessments used in the fall to screen students at risk of failing to learn the knowledge and skills described in the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Focal Point Standards. At each grade level, the assessment consisted of a 48-item test with three 16-item sub-test sets aligned to the…
Descriptors: At Risk Students, Mathematics Teachers, National Standards, Item Response Theory
