Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Algorithms | 2 |
| High School Students | 2 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 2 |
| Intervention | 2 |
| Active Learning | 1 |
| Biology | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Computation | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Computer Simulation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Deborah Tatar | 1 |
| Kaushal Kumar Bhagat | 1 |
| Line Have Musaeus | 1 |
| Nitesh Kumar Jha | 1 |
| Peter Musaeus | 1 |
| Plaban Kumar Bhowmik | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Denmark | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLine Have Musaeus; Deborah Tatar; Peter Musaeus – Journal of Biological Education, 2024
Computational modelling is widely used in biological science. Therefore, biology students need to learn computational modelling. However, there is a lack of evidence about how to teach computational modelling in biology and what the effects are on student learning. The purpose of this intervention-control study was to investigate how knowledge in…
Descriptors: Computation, Models, High School Students, Biology
Nitesh Kumar Jha; Plaban Kumar Bhowmik; Kaushal Kumar Bhagat – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2024
A majority of research in Computational Thinking (CT) mainly focuses on teaching coding to school students. However, CT involves more than just coding and includes other skills like algorithmic thinking. The current study developed an Online Inquiry-based Learning Platform for Computational Thinking (CT-ONLINQ) that follows Inquiry-Based Learning…
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Computer Science Education, Comparative Analysis, Problem Solving
