Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Action Research | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Grades (Scholastic) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Identification | 1 |
| Mixed Methods Research | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Canadian Journal of Action… | 1 |
Author
| Len Chan | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkLen Chan – Canadian Journal of Action Research, 2025
Anonymous marking, as a means to mitigate bias in grading, involves evaluating student work with their identities withheld. Anonymous marking is explored in this self-study to mitigate implicit bias, which negated a practitioner-researcher's educational values. The mixed methods action research findings show withholding student identities during…
Descriptors: Grading, Evaluation Methods, Student Evaluation, Bias
