Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Sampling | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Bayesian Statistics | 1 |
| Best Practices | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| College Admission | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Curriculum | 1 |
| Educational Assessment | 1 |
| Equated Scores | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Educational Measurement:… | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNiessen, A. Susan M.; Meijer, Rob R.; Tendeiro, Jorge N. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2019
A longstanding concern about admissions to higher education is the underprediction of female academic performance by admission test scores. One explanation for these findings is selection system bias, that is, not all relevant KSAOs that are related to academic performance and gender are included in the prediction model. One solution to this…
Descriptors: College Admission, High Stakes Tests, Gender Differences, Sampling
Wu, Margaret – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2010
In large-scale assessments, such as state-wide testing programs, national sample-based assessments, and international comparative studies, there are many steps involved in the measurement and reporting of student achievement. There are always sources of inaccuracies in each of the steps. It is of interest to identify the source and magnitude of…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Educational Assessment, Measures (Individuals), Program Effectiveness
