Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Media Selection | 2 |
| Selection Tools | 2 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Information Sources | 1 |
| Information Technology | 1 |
| Library Development | 1 |
| Library Materials | 1 |
| Literacy | 1 |
| Performance Factors | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Caribbean | 1 |
| Europe | 1 |
| Middle East | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textChrist, Tanya; Arya, Poonam; Chiu, Ming Ming – Journal of Education and Learning, 2023
The DigiLit Framework suggests criteria for digital text and tool selection (content accuracy, intuitiveness, interactivity, quality) and integration (model a literacy skill or strategy, guide a literacy skill or strategy, model digital feature use, guide digital feature use) in literacy lessons. Using survey research, we explored which DigiLit…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Technology Integration, Media Selection, Selection Tools
Direct linkLaskowski, Mary S. – Acquisitions Librarian, 2004
Media selection and acquisition is highly dependent on a number of variables, perhaps the most important of which is changing technologies. New technology is a wonderful and frightening thing, with a high level of impact on media collection development. New technologies can improve sound and visual quality, but can also play havoc with established…
Descriptors: Media Selection, Information Technology, Technological Literacy, Selection Tools
