NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greving, Sven; Lenhard, Wolfgang; Richter, Tobias – Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2020
Retrieval practice promotes retention more than restudying (i.e., the "testing effect") and is applied to many educational settings. However, little research has investigated means to enhance this effect in educational settings. Theoretical accounts assume retrieval practice to be the most effective whenever retrieval is difficult but…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Recall (Psychology), Retention (Psychology), Adaptive Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sun, Bo; Zhu, Yunzong; Xiao, Yongkang; Xiao, Rong; Wei, Yungang – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2019
In recent years, computerized adaptive testing (CAT) has gained popularity as an important means to evaluate students' ability. Assigning tags to test questions is crucial in CAT. Manual tagging is widely used for constructing question banks; however, this approach is time-consuming and might lead to consistency issues. Automatic question tagging,…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Student Evaluation, Test Items, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Schultz, Madeleine – Journal of Learning Design, 2011
This paper reports on the development of a tool that generates randomised, non-multiple choice assessment within the BlackBoard Learning Management System interface. An accepted weakness of multiple-choice assessment is that it cannot elicit learning outcomes from upper levels of Biggs' SOLO taxonomy. However, written assessment items require…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Feedback (Response), Student Evaluation, Large Group Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vuk, Jasna; Morse, David T. – Research in the Schools, 2009
In this study we observed college students' behavior on two self-tailored, multiple-choice exams. Self-tailoring was defined as an option to omit up to five items from being scored on an exam. Participants, 80 undergraduate college students enrolled in two sections of an educational psychology course, statistically significantly improved their…
Descriptors: College Students, Educational Psychology, Academic Achievement, Correlation