Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Author
| Attali, Yigal | 1 |
| Bernas, Ronan S. | 1 |
| Burstein, Jill | 1 |
| Deess, Perry | 1 |
| Elliot, Norbert | 1 |
| Garcia, Veronica | 1 |
| Gibbs, William J. | 1 |
| Joshi, Kamal | 1 |
| Klobucar, Andrew | 1 |
| Ramineni, Chaitanya | 1 |
| Rudner, Lawrence M. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkRamineni, Chaitanya – Assessing Writing, 2013
In this paper, I describe the design and evaluation of automated essay scoring (AES) models for an institution's writing placement program. Information was gathered on admitted student writing performance at a science and technology research university in the northeastern United States. Under timed conditions, first-year students (N = 879) were…
Descriptors: Validity, Comparative Analysis, Internet, Student Placement
Klobucar, Andrew; Elliot, Norbert; Deess, Perry; Rudniy, Oleksandr; Joshi, Kamal – Assessing Writing, 2013
This study investigated the use of automated essay scoring (AES) to identify at-risk students enrolled in a first-year university writing course. An application of AES, the "Criterion"[R] Online Writing Evaluation Service was evaluated through a methodology focusing on construct modelling, response processes, disaggregation, extrapolation,…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Scoring, Writing Instruction, Essays
Gibbs, William J.; Bernas, Ronan S. – Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2007
This descriptive pilot study employed the Grascha-Riechmann Student Learning Style Scale (GRSLSS) to examine student communication and interactions in an online educational discussion that occurred for fourteen days. Discussion activity exhibited conversational turns and messages appeared as conversation rather than expository. Individuals scoring…
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Computer Software Evaluation, Measures (Individuals), Scoring
Download full textRudner, Lawrence M.; Garcia, Veronica; Welch, Catherine – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
This report provides a two-part evaluation of the IntelliMetric[SM] automated essay scoring system based on its performance scoring essays from the Analytic Writing Assessment of the Graduate Management Admission Test[TM] (GMAT[TM]). The IntelliMetric system performance is first compared to that of individual human raters, a Bayesian system…
Descriptors: Writing Evaluation, Writing Tests, Scoring, Essays
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
E-rater[R] has been used by the Educational Testing Service for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (V.2) that is different from other automated essay scoring systems in several important respects. The main innovations of e-rater V.2 are a small, intuitive, and meaningful set of features used for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Writing Evaluation
