Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 9 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 9 |
Test Bias | 9 |
Test Items | 7 |
Grade 4 | 6 |
Elementary School Students | 5 |
Mathematics Tests | 5 |
Foreign Countries | 4 |
Item Response Theory | 4 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Difficulty Level | 2 |
Disabilities | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational Assessment | 2 |
International Journal of… | 2 |
Assessment & Evaluation in… | 1 |
ETS Research Report Series | 1 |
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
Journal of Pedagogy | 1 |
Partnership for Assessment of… | 1 |
Author
Alexeev, Natalia | 1 |
Ali, Usama | 1 |
Barton, Karen | 1 |
Beretvas, S. Natasha | 1 |
Blömeke, Sigrid | 1 |
Braeken, Johan | 1 |
Brown, Terran | 1 |
Cawthon, Stephanie W. | 1 |
Chen, Jianshen | 1 |
Choi, Youn-Jeng | 1 |
Cohen, Allan S. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Reports - Research | 7 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 9 |
Intermediate Grades | 9 |
Grade 4 | 7 |
Middle Schools | 4 |
Grade 5 | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Grade 9 | 2 |
High Schools | 2 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Hong Kong | 2 |
Qatar | 2 |
Singapore | 2 |
Slovakia | 2 |
Taiwan | 2 |
Australia | 1 |
Austria | 1 |
Botswana | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
Chile | 1 |
El Salvador | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Progress in International… | 2 |
Trends in International… | 2 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Russell, Michael; Szendey, Olivia; Li, Zhushan – Educational Assessment, 2022
Recent research provides evidence that an intersectional approach to defining reference and focal groups results in a higher percentage of comparisons flagged for potential DIF. The study presented here examined the generalizability of this pattern across methods for examining DIF. While the level of DIF detection differed among the four methods…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Item Analysis, Test Items, Test Construction
Oliveri, María Elena; Ercikan, Kadriye; Zumbo, Bruno D.; Lawless, René – International Journal of Testing, 2014
In this study, we contrast results from two differential item functioning (DIF) approaches (manifest and latent class) by the number of items and sources of items identified as DIF using data from an international reading assessment. The latter approach yielded three latent classes, presenting evidence of heterogeneity in examinee response…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Comparative Analysis, Reading Tests, Effect Size
Liu, Junhui; Brown, Terran; Chen, Jianshen; Ali, Usama; Hou, Likun; Costanzo, Kate – Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers, 2016
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) is a state-led consortium working to develop next-generation assessments that more accurately, compared to previous assessments, measure student progress toward college and career readiness. The PARCC assessments include both English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA/L) and…
Descriptors: Testing, Achievement Tests, Test Items, Test Bias
Choi, Youn-Jeng; Alexeev, Natalia; Cohen, Allan S. – International Journal of Testing, 2015
The purpose of this study was to explore what may be contributing to differences in performance in mathematics on the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2007. This was done by using a mixture item response theory modeling approach to first detect latent classes in the data and then to examine differences in performance on items…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Mathematics Achievement, Mathematics Tests, Item Response Theory
Beretvas, S. Natasha; Cawthon, Stephanie W.; Lockhart, L. Leland; Kaye, Alyssa D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
This pedagogical article is intended to explain the similarities and differences between the parameterizations of two multilevel measurement model (MMM) frameworks. The conventional two-level MMM that includes item indicators and models item scores (Level 1) clustered within examinees (Level 2) and the two-level cross-classified MMM (in which item…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Comparative Analysis, Test Items, Difficulty Level
Ferjencík, Ján; Slavkovská, Miriam; Kresila, Juraj – Journal of Pedagogy, 2015
The paper reports on the adaptation of a D-KEFS test battery for Slovakia. Drawing on concrete examples, it describes and illustrates the key issues relating to the transfer of test items from one socio-cultural environment to another. The standardisation sample of the population of Slovak pupils in the fourth year of primary school included 250…
Descriptors: Executive Function, Foreign Countries, Test Construction, Test Items
Braeken, Johan; Blömeke, Sigrid – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016
Using data from the international Teacher Education and Development Study: Learning to Teach Mathematics (TEDS-M), the measurement equivalence of teachers' beliefs across countries is investigated for the case of "mathematics-as-a fixed-ability". Measurement equivalence is a crucial topic in all international large-scale assessments and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Bayesian Statistics, Test Bias, Teacher Education
Finch, Holmes; Barton, Karen; Meyer, Patrick – Educational Assessment, 2009
The No Child Left Behind act resulted in an increased reliance on large-scale standardized tests to assess the progress of individual students as well as schools. In addition, emphasis was placed on including all students in the testing programs as well as those with disabilities. As a result, the role of testing accommodations has become more…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Testing Accommodations, Standardized Tests, Mathematics Tests
Middleton, Kyndra; Laitusis, Cara Cahalan – ETS Research Report Series, 2007
This study examined whether distractor choices functioned differently for students without learning disabilities than they functioned for students with learning disabilities who received no accommodation, students with learning disabilities who received a read-aloud accommodation, and students with learning disabilities who received some form of…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Learning Disabilities, Comparative Analysis, Academic Accommodations (Disabilities)