Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Grade 7 | 3 |
Middle School Students | 3 |
Predictive Validity | 3 |
Writing Evaluation | 3 |
Automation | 2 |
Bias | 2 |
Elementary School Students | 2 |
Essays | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Scoring | 2 |
Writing Tests | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Ebru Öztürk | 1 |
Erol Duran | 1 |
Keller-Margulis, Milena A. | 1 |
Matta, Michael | 1 |
Mercer, Sterett H. | 1 |
Michael Matta | 1 |
Milena A. Keller-Margulis | 1 |
Sterett H. Mercer | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Grade 7 | 3 |
Junior High Schools | 3 |
Middle Schools | 3 |
Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Intermediate Grades | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Ebru Öztürk; Erol Duran – Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 2024
In this study, it was aimed to develop a rubric to evaluate the creative story writing skill levels of seventh grade secondary school students. The research was designed in quantitative research method and survey model. In the research, convenience sampling technique was used and 270 students studying at the seventh grade level of secondary school…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Writing Evaluation, Creative Writing, Middle School Students
Implications of Bias in Automated Writing Quality Scores for Fair and Equitable Assessment Decisions
Matta, Michael; Mercer, Sterett H.; Keller-Margulis, Milena A. – School Psychology, 2023
Recent advances in automated writing evaluation have enabled educators to use automated writing quality scores to improve assessment feasibility. However, there has been limited investigation of bias for automated writing quality scores with students from diverse racial or ethnic backgrounds. The use of biased scores could contribute to…
Descriptors: Bias, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Scoring
Implications of Bias in Automated Writing Quality Scores for Fair and Equitable Assessment Decisions
Michael Matta; Sterett H. Mercer; Milena A. Keller-Margulis – Grantee Submission, 2023
Recent advances in automated writing evaluation have enabled educators to use automated writing quality scores to improve assessment feasibility. However, there has been limited investigation of bias for automated writing quality scores with students from diverse racial or ethnic backgrounds. The use of biased scores could contribute to…
Descriptors: Bias, Automation, Writing Evaluation, Scoring