Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
| Behavioral Disorders | 1 |
| Education Digest: Essential… | 1 |
| Intervention in School and… | 1 |
| Preventing School Failure | 1 |
| Professional School Counseling | 1 |
| Remedial and Special Education | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 6 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
| Middle Schools | 6 |
| Elementary Education | 5 |
| Intermediate Grades | 2 |
| Junior High Schools | 2 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Early Childhood Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Grade 1 | 1 |
| Grade 2 | 1 |
| Grade 3 | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Strengths and Difficulties… | 2 |
| Behavior Assessment System… | 1 |
| Intervention Rating Profile | 1 |
| Social Skills Rating System | 1 |
| Systematic Screening for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMcDaniel, Sara C.; Bruhn, Allison L.; Mitchell, Barbara S. – Preventing School Failure, 2017
Students requiring Tier 2 behavioral supports frequently display behavioral deficits in multiple domains (e.g., emotional symptoms and peer problems). The Tier 2 framework developed by McDaniel, Bruhn, & Mitchell (2015a) is a responsive structure for identifying and intervening at Tier 2. This process is described with a practical case example…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Middle School Students, Case Studies, At Risk Students
Donohue, Peg; Goodman-Scott, Emily; Betters-Bubon, Jennifer – Professional School Counseling, 2016
This study describes the benefits of systematic universal screening (US) for school counselors engaged in the creation of effective, multi-tiered systems of support that address academic, social, emotional, and behavioral student concerns. The authors used an action research framework to present a case example of one school district's pilot of US…
Descriptors: Identification, At Risk Students, Screening Tests, Case Studies
Hartman, Kelsey; Gresham, Frank M.; Byrd, Shelby – Behavioral Disorders, 2017
Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk in schools facilitates early identification and intervention for students as part of multitiered systems of support. Early identification has the potential to mitigate adverse outcomes of emotional and behavioral disorders. The purpose of this study was to extend existing research on the…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Screening Tests, Test Validity, Test Reliability
Nordness, Philip D.; Epstein, Michael H.; Cullinan, Douglas; Pierce, Corey D. – Remedial and Special Education, 2014
The Emotional and Behavioral Screener (EBS) is a universal screening instrument designed to identify students whose excessive problem behaviors put them at risk of the education disability category of emotional disturbance (ED). This article reports findings from three studies that address the reliability and validity of the EBS. Studies 1 and 2…
Descriptors: Screening Tests, Disability Identification, Behavior Problems, At Risk Students
Samuels, Christina A. – Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 2011
The 2004-05 school year didn't start off well for the Sanger Unified School District. The district, located east of Fresno, had entered its first year of "program improvement"--a gentler way of saying that Sanger was among the 98 lowest-performing districts in the state based on success criteria in the No Child Left Behind law. The…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Program Improvement, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
Reutebuch, Colleen K. – Intervention in School and Clinic, 2008
Response to intervention (RTI) is a framework for providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to students' individual needs. It includes the practice of frequent progress monitoring and use of data to make educational decisions about instructional and grouping practices as well as the duration, frequency, and amount of time…
Descriptors: Intervention, Federal Legislation, Learning Disabilities, School Districts
