Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Moral Values | 2 |
| Prediction | 2 |
| Structural Equation Models | 2 |
| Undergraduate Students | 2 |
| Behavior Theories | 1 |
| Cheating | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Questionnaires | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Glover, Rebecca J.; Natesan, Prathiba; Wang, Jie; Rohr, Danielle; McAfee-Etheridge, Lauri; Booker, Dana D.; Bishop, James; Lee, David; Kildare, Cory; Wu, Minwei – Journal of Moral Education, 2014
Explorations of relationships between Haidt's Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ) and indices of moral decision-making assessed by the Defining Issues Test have been limited to correlational analyses. This study used Harm, Fairness, Ingroup, Authority and Purity to predict overall moral judgment and individual Defining Issues Test-2 (DIT-2)…
Descriptors: Moral Values, Scores, Undergraduate Students, Prediction
Mayhew, Matthew J.; Hubbard, Steven M.; Finelli, Cynthia J.; Harding, Trevor S.; Carpenter, Donald D. – Review of Higher Education, 2009
The purpose of this paper is to validate the use of a modified Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) for predicting undergraduate student cheating. Specifically, we administered a survey assessing how the TPB relates to cheating along with a measure of moral reasoning (DIT- 2) to 527 undergraduate students across three institutions; and analyzed the…
Descriptors: Structural Equation Models, Cheating, Behavior Theories, Validity

Peer reviewed
Direct link
