Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
College Entrance Examinations | 5 |
Scoring | 5 |
Writing Tests | 5 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 4 |
Correlation | 4 |
Graduate Study | 4 |
Reliability | 4 |
Validity | 4 |
Computer Software | 3 |
Essays | 3 |
Automation | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Attali, Yigal | 6 |
Burstein, Jill | 2 |
Breyer, F. Jay | 1 |
Briller, Vladimir | 1 |
Duchnowski, Matthew | 1 |
Elliot, Norbert | 1 |
Harris, April | 1 |
Hawthorn, John | 1 |
Huey, Heather | 1 |
Joshi, Kamal | 1 |
Katz, Irvin R. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 6 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 10 | 1 |
Grade 11 | 1 |
Grade 12 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Grade 9 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
New Jersey | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Graduate Record Examinations | 3 |
Graduate Management Admission… | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Breyer, F. Jay; Attali, Yigal; Williamson, David M.; Ridolfi-McCulla, Laura; Ramineni, Chaitanya; Duchnowski, Matthew; Harris, April – ETS Research Report Series, 2014
In this research, we investigated the feasibility of implementing the "e-rater"® scoring engine as a check score in place of all-human scoring for the "Graduate Record Examinations"® ("GRE"®) revised General Test (rGRE) Analytical Writing measure. This report provides the scientific basis for the use of e-rater as a…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Computer Assisted Testing, Scoring, College Entrance Examinations
Attali, Yigal; Sinharay, Sandip – ETS Research Report Series, 2015
The "e-rater"® automated essay scoring system is used operationally in the scoring of the argument and issue tasks that form the Analytical Writing measure of the "GRE"® General Test. For each of these tasks, this study explored the value added of reporting 4 trait scores for each of these 2 tasks over the total e-rater score.…
Descriptors: Scores, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Software, Grammar
Attali, Yigal; Powers, Don; Hawthorn, John – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
Registered examinees for the GRE® General Test answered open-ended sentence-completion items. For half of the items, participants received immediate feedback on the correctness of their answers and up to two opportunities to revise their answers. A significant feedback-and-revision effect was found. Participants were able to correct many of their…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Graduate Study, Sentences, Psychometrics
Katz, Irvin R.; Elliot, Norbert; Attali, Yigal; Scharf, Davida; Powers, Donald; Huey, Heather; Joshi, Kamal; Briller, Vladimir – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
This study presents an investigation of information literacy as defined by the ETS iSkills™ assessment and by the New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) Information Literacy Scale (ILS). As two related but distinct measures, both iSkills and the ILS were used with undergraduate students at NJIT during the spring 2006 semester. Undergraduate…
Descriptors: Information Literacy, Information Skills, Skill Analysis, Case Studies
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2006
E-rater[R] has been used by the Educational Testing Service for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (V.2) that is different from other automated essay scoring systems in several important respects. The main innovations of e-rater V.2 are a small, intuitive, and meaningful set of features used for…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Test Scoring Machines, Scoring, Writing Evaluation
Attali, Yigal; Burstein, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2005
The e-rater® system has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and…
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Automation, Scoring, Comparative Analysis