Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Scientists | 1 |
| Test Construction | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
| Trust (Psychology) | 1 |
| Undergraduate Students | 1 |
Source
| School Science and Mathematics | 1 |
Author
| Cornell, Ken | 1 |
| Husting, Virginia | 1 |
| Jarratt Smith, Mary | 1 |
| Jorcyk, Cheryl | 1 |
| Matson, Sam | 1 |
| Nadelson, Louis | 1 |
| Yang, Dazhi | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkNadelson, Louis; Jorcyk, Cheryl; Yang, Dazhi; Jarratt Smith, Mary; Matson, Sam; Cornell, Ken; Husting, Virginia – School Science and Mathematics, 2014
Trust in science and scientists can greatly influence consideration of scientific developments and activities. Yet, trust is a nebulous construct based on emotions, knowledge, beliefs, and relationships. As we explored the literature regarding trust in science and scientists we discovered that no instruments were available to assess the construct,…
Descriptors: Trust (Psychology), Test Construction, College Faculty, Undergraduate Students
