NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Wang, Lu; Steedle, Jeffrey – ACT, Inc., 2020
In recent ACT mode comparability studies, students testing on laptop or desktop computers earned slightly higher scores on average than students who tested on paper, especially on the ACT® reading and English tests (Li et al., 2017). Equating procedures adjust for such "mode effects" to make ACT scores comparable regardless of testing…
Descriptors: Test Format, Reading Tests, Language Tests, English
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Liu, Jinghua; Guo, Hongwen; Dorans, Neil J. – ETS Research Report Series, 2014
Maintaining score interchangeability and scale consistency is crucial for any testing programs that administer multiple forms across years. The use of a multiple linking design, which involves equating a new form to multiple old forms and averaging the conversions, has been proposed to control scale drift. However, the use of multiple linking…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Reliability, Test Construction, Equated Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
LaFlair, Geoffrey T.; Isbell, Daniel; May, L. D. Nicolas; Gutierrez Arvizu, Maria Nelly; Jamieson, Joan – Language Testing, 2017
Language programs need multiple test forms for secure administrations and effective placement decisions, but can they have confidence that scores on alternate test forms have the same meaning? In large-scale testing programs, various equating methods are available to ensure the comparability of forms. The choice of equating method is informed by…
Descriptors: Language Tests, Equated Scores, Testing Programs, Comparative Analysis
Kim, YoungKoung; DeCarlo, Lawrence T. – College Board, 2016
Because of concerns about test security, different test forms are typically used across different testing occasions. As a result, equating is necessary in order to get scores from the different test forms that can be used interchangeably. In order to assure the quality of equating, multiple equating methods are often examined. Various equity…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Evaluation Methods, Sampling, Statistical Inference
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Liu, Jinghua; Zu, Jiyun; Curley, Edward; Carey, Jill – ETS Research Report Series, 2014
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of discrete anchor items versus passage-based anchor items on observed score equating using empirical data.This study compares an "SAT"® critical reading anchor that contains more discrete items proportionally, compared to the total tests to be equated, to another anchor that…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Test Items, College Entrance Examinations, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Guo, Hongwen; Liu, Jinghua; Curley, Edward; Dorans, Neil – ETS Research Report Series, 2012
This study examines the stability of the "SAT Reasoning Test"™ score scales from 2005 to 2010. A 2005 old form (OF) was administered along with a 2010 new form (NF). A new conversion for OF was derived through direct equipercentile equating. A comparison of the newly derived and the original OF conversions showed that Critical Reading…
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Tests, Thinking Skills, Equated Scores
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Liu, Jinghua; Curley, Edward; Low, Albert – ETS Research Report Series, 2009
This study examines the stability of the SAT® scale from 1994 to 2001. A 1994 form and a 2001 form were readministered in a 2005 SAT administration, and the 1994 form was equated to the 2001 form. The new conversion was compared to the old conversion. Both the verbal and math sections exhibit a similar degree of scale drift, but in opposite…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Scaling, Verbal Tests, Mathematics Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Liu, Jinghua; Zhu, Xiaowen – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
The purpose of this paper is to explore methods to approximate population invariance without conducting multiple linkings for subpopulations. Under the single group or equivalent groups design, no linking needs to be performed for the parallel-linear system linking functions. The unequated raw score information can be used as an approximation. For…
Descriptors: Raw Scores, Test Format, Comparative Analysis, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Haberman, Shelby J.; Guo, Hongwen; Liu, Jinghua; Dorans, Neil J. – ETS Research Report Series, 2008
This study uses historical data to explore the consistency of SAT® I: Reasoning Test score conversions and to examine trends in scaled score means. During the period from April 1995 to December 2003, both Verbal (V) and Math (M) means display substantial seasonality, and a slight increasing trend for both is observed. SAT Math means increase more…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Thinking Skills, Logical Thinking, Scaling
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Liu, Jinghua; Low, Albert C. – ETS Research Report Series, 2007
This study applied kernel equating (KE) in two scenarios: equating to a very similar population and equating to a very different population, referred to as a distant population, using SAT® data. The KE results were compared to the results obtained from analogous classical equating methods in both scenarios. The results indicate that KE results are…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Equated Scores, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods
Dorans, Neil J. – College Entrance Examination Board, 2000
Distinctions were made between three classes of statistical linkage: equivalence, concordance, and prediction. These distinctions were based on rational content considerations and empirical statistical relationships. A large database involving SAT I and ACT scores was used to determine which type of linkage was best suited for different scores and…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Prediction, Scores, Standardized Tests
Schneider, Dianne; Dorans, Neil – College Entrance Examination Board, 1999
This paper describes how results on the ACT and SAT I can be compared through statistical linking procedures.
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Student Characteristics, Comparative Analysis, Scores
Lawrence, Ida M.; Schmidt, Amy Elizabeth – College Entrance Examination Board, 2001
The SAT® I: Reasoning Test is administered seven times a year. Primarily for security purposes, several different test forms are given at each administration. How is it possible to compare scores obtained from different test forms and from different test administrations? The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the statistical…
Descriptors: Scores, Comparative Analysis, Standardized Tests, College Entrance Examinations
Cascallar, Alicia S.; Dorans, Neil J. – College Entrance Examination Board, 2003
Score linkages between the Verbal and Math sections of the SAT® I: Reasoning Test and the corresponding sections of the new version of a Spanish-language admissions test, the Prueba de Aptitud Academica® (PAA™) were investigated. A bilingual group design was employed. A language proficiency measure (ESLAT) was used to define the bilingual group…
Descriptors: Equated Scores, Spanish, English, Language of Instruction