Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Data Use | 2 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 2 |
| Scoring Rubrics | 2 |
| Administrator Attitudes | 1 |
| Administrator Surveys | 1 |
| Alignment (Education) | 1 |
| Art Education | 1 |
| Art Teachers | 1 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Community | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textGroover, Cynthia D.; McBrayer, Juliann Sergi; Cleveland, Richard; Riggs, Amy Jo – Research & Practice in Assessment, 2019
Many institutions implement assessment teams as resources to develop faculty and staff knowledge of and confidence in programmatic assessment processes. Additional resources may include rubrics or peer review and feedback, but effectiveness of these resources is rarely evaluated. Programmatic assessment allows institutions to examine the impact of…
Descriptors: Student Personnel Services, Student Personnel Workers, Administrator Surveys, Scoring Rubrics
Direct linkGuenter, Cris – National Art Education Association, 2019
The teaching performance expectations and assignments that preservice art teachers currently address in field experiences and in their coursework are designed to help them meet the expectations of being a quality art educator in the 21st century. These assignments may be very different from the assignments that art educators had in their…
Descriptors: Data Use, Decision Making, Data Collection, Art Education
