NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 18 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tuncay-Yüksel, Büsra; Yilmaz-Tüzün, Özgül; Zeidler, Dana L. – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2023
The purpose of this study was to test predictability of environmental moral reasoning patterns of preservice science teachers (PSTs) by their epistemological beliefs and values. Four environmental moral dilemma scenarios that reflect different environmental moral dilemma situations taking place in four outdoor recreation contexts (i.e., hiking,…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Foreign Countries, Conservation (Environment), Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Deependra Budhathoki; Gregory D. Foley; Stephen Shadik – Numeracy, 2024
Many educators and professional organizations recommend Quantitative Reasoning as the best entrylevel postsecondary mathematics course for non-STEM majors. However, novice and veteran instructors who have no prior experience in teaching a QR course often express their ignorance of the content to choose for this course, the instruction to offer…
Descriptors: College Mathematics, Mathematics Instruction, Teaching Methods, Mathematics Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Claudia Saccone; Joanne Murray; Sulekha Gunasekaran; Sebastian H. Doeltgen – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2025
Background: Sound clinical reasoning is crucial for synthesizing assessment and contextual information into evidence-based and patient-centred management decisions. Whilst clinical reasoning processes and development have been explored in broader health contexts, to date there has been limited evaluation of how clinical reasoning skills are…
Descriptors: Clinical Experience, Clinical Diagnosis, Speech Language Pathology, Allied Health Personnel
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Purzer, Senay; Schimpf, Corey; Quintana-Cifuentes, Jenny; Sereiviene, Elena; Lingam, Indraneel; Jiang, Rundong – Science Teacher, 2022
Design review sessions are commonly used in real-world design. Design review sessions are also common in undergraduate engineering education to help reveal students' decision-making processes necessary for informed design (Adams and Siddiqui 2016). Through design reviews, educators examine student reasoning, progress, and provide feedback as…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, Design, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lindsey, Beth A.; Stetzer, MacKenzie R.; Speirs, J. Caleb; Ferm, William N., Jr.; van Hulten, Alexander – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2023
In this paper, we seek to evaluate the extent to which students can follow a deductive reasoning chain when it is presented to them. A great deal of instruction in introductory physics courses is centered on presenting students with a logical argument that starts from first principles and systematically leads to a particular conclusion. This…
Descriptors: Physics, Science Education, Scientific Concepts, Concept Formation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Joughin, Gordon; Boud, David; Dawson, Phillip – Higher Education Research and Development, 2019
Students' capacity for making evaluative judgements of their own work is widely acknowledged as central to their learning within programmes as well as being vital to their subsequent professional practice. In higher education literature, the act of evaluative judgement is usually portrayed as a process of deliberative, analytical reasoning…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Decision Making, Heuristics, Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lieber, Leonie; Graulich, Nicole – Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2022
Building scientific arguments is a central ability for all scientists regardless of their specific domain. In organic chemistry, building arguments is a necessary skill to estimate reaction processes in consideration of the reactivities of reaction centres or the chemical and physical properties. Moreover, building arguments for multiple reaction…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Science Instruction, Organic Chemistry, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Zeybek Simsek, Zulfiye – European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2021
There is a wide recognition that reasoning abstractly, constructing arguments, or critiquing arguments should be an important educational goal in the mathematical experiences of all students in the standards for school mathematics. Seeing these standards as an essential element for developing deep mathematical understanding; however, call for a…
Descriptors: Preservice Teachers, Student Attitudes, Decision Making, Abstract Reasoning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Stephens, Rachel G.; Dunn, John C.; Hayes, Brett K. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2019
When asked to determine whether a syllogistic argument is deductively valid, people are influenced by their prior beliefs about the believability of the conclusion. Recently, two competing explanations for this belief bias effect have been proposed, each based on signal detection theory (SDT). Under a response bias explanation, people set more…
Descriptors: Beliefs, Bias, Logical Thinking, Persuasive Discourse
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Aumont, Étienne; Blanchette, Caroll-Ann; Bohbot, Veronique D.; West, Greg L. – Learning & Memory, 2019
When people navigate, they use strategies dependent on one of two memory systems. The hippocampus-based spatial strategy consists of using multiple landmarks to create a cognitive map of the environment. In contrast, the caudate nucleus-based response strategy is based on the memorization of a series of turns. Importantly, response learners…
Descriptors: Memory, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Memorization, Navigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Petitt, Destini N.; Forbes, Cory T. – Natural Sciences Education, 2019
Growing human populations place increasing demands on our planet, resulting in an array of challenges with both scientific and non-scientific dimensions. These challenges are collectively known as socio-scientific issues (SSIs). It is essential to understand how students learn to use values to reason about SSIs, particularly when dealing with…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Science and Society, Science Process Skills, Earth Science
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Insani, Metri Dian; Pratiwi, Novida; Muhardjito, M. – Journal of Biological Education Indonesia (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 2019
This research was aimed at profiling student's thinking skills in dealing with Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) questions based on Marzano taxonomy by referring to 13 indicators. This pre-experimental research employed pretest-posttest design. The indicators included were comparison, classification, deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning,…
Descriptors: Biology, Taxonomy, Science Instruction, Thinking Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kryjevskaia, Mila; Stetzer, MacKenzie R.; Lindsey, Beth A.; McInerny, Alistair; Heron, Paula R. L.; Boudreaux, Andrew – Physical Review Physics Education Research, 2020
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Curriculum Development: Theory into Design.] Research in physics education has contributed substantively to improvements in the learning and teaching of university physics by informing the development of research-based instructional materials for physics courses. Reports on the design of these…
Descriptors: Material Development, Science Instruction, Physics, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Dauer, Jenny M.; Lute, Michelle L.; Straka, Olivia – International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2017
We propose two contrasting types of student decision-making based on social and cognitive psychology models of separate mental processes for problem solving. Informal decision-making uses intuitive reasoning and is subject to cognitive biases, whereas formal decision-making uses effortful, logical reasoning. We explored indicators of students'…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Science and Society, Cognitive Processes, Science Process Skills
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dumas, Denis; Alexander, Patricia A.; Baker, Lisa M.; Jablansky, Sophie; Dunbar, Kevin N. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 2014
Relational reasoning, which has been defined as the ability to discern meaningful patterns within any informational stream, is a foundational cognitive ability associated with education, including in scientific domains. This study entailed the analysis of instructional conversations in which an attending clinical neurologist and his team of…
Descriptors: Medical Education, Abstract Reasoning, Logical Thinking, Clinical Diagnosis
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2