Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 12 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 31 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 42 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 50 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Allen, Laura K. | 2 |
Eshuis, Jannes | 2 |
Giesbers, Bas | 2 |
Han, Chao | 2 |
Jordan, Sally | 2 |
Koper, Rob | 2 |
Waterink, Wim | 2 |
van Bruggen, Jan | 2 |
Ahmad Alkhayyat | 1 |
Al-Jarf, Reima | 1 |
Alexandra Farazouli | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Researchers | 1 |
Students | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
China | 7 |
Spain | 5 |
Netherlands | 4 |
United Kingdom | 4 |
Australia | 3 |
Turkey | 3 |
United States | 3 |
Asia | 2 |
Brazil | 2 |
Egypt | 2 |
Europe | 2 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
International English… | 1 |
Michigan Test of English… | 1 |
Program for International… | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Mike Perkins; Jasper Roe; Darius Postma; James McGaughran; Don Hickerson – Journal of Academic Ethics, 2024
This study explores the capability of academic staff assisted by the Turnitin Artificial Intelligence (AI) detection tool to identify the use of AI-generated content in university assessments. 22 different experimental submissions were produced using Open AI's ChatGPT tool, with prompting techniques used to reduce the likelihood of AI detectors…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Evaluation, Identification, Natural Language Processing
Alexandra Farazouli; Teresa Cerratto-Pargman; Klara Bolander-Laksov; Cormac McGrath – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
AI chatbots have recently fuelled debate regarding education practices in higher education institutions worldwide. Focusing on Generative AI and ChatGPT in particular, our study examines how AI chatbots impact university teachers' assessment practices, exploring teachers' perceptions about how ChatGPT performs in response to home examination…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Student Evaluation, Educational Change
Jiahui Luo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study offers a critical examination of university policies developed to address recent challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) to higher education assessment. Drawing on Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be' (WPR) framework, we analysed the GenAI policies of 20 world-leading universities to explore what are considered problems…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Policy, College Students, Student Evaluation
Dirk H. R. Spennemann; Jessica Biles; Lachlan Brown; Matthew F. Ireland; Laura Longmore; Clare L. Singh; Anthony Wallis; Catherine Ward – Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 2024
Purpose: The use of generative artificial intelligence (genAi) language models such as ChatGPT to write assignment text is well established. This paper aims to assess to what extent genAi can be used to obtain guidance on how to avoid detection when commissioning and submitting contract-written assignments and how workable the offered solutions…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Technology Uses in Education, Cheating
Emerson, Andrew; Min, Wookhee; Azevedo, Roger; Lester, James – British Journal of Educational Technology, 2023
Game-based learning environments hold significant promise for facilitating learning experiences that are both effective and engaging. To support individualised learning and support proactive scaffolding when students are struggling, game-based learning environments should be able to accurately predict student knowledge at early points in students'…
Descriptors: Game Based Learning, Natural Language Processing, Prediction, Student Evaluation
Binglin Chen – ProQuest LLC, 2022
Assessment is a key component of education. Routine grading of students' work, however, is time consuming. Automating the grading process allows instructors to spend more of their time helping their students learn and engaging their students with more open-ended, creative activities. One way to automate grading is through computer-based…
Descriptors: College Students, STEM Education, Student Evaluation, Grading
Sebastian Gombert; Aron Fink; Tornike Giorgashvili; Ioana Jivet; Daniele Di Mitri; Jane Yau; Andreas Frey; Hendrik Drachsler – International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2024
Various studies empirically proved the value of highly informative feedback for enhancing learner success. However, digital educational technology has yet to catch up as automated feedback is often provided shallowly. This paper presents a case study on implementing a pipeline that provides German-speaking university students enrolled in an…
Descriptors: Automation, Student Evaluation, Essays, Feedback (Response)
María-Isabel de Vicente-Yagüe-Jara; Olivia López-Martínez; Verónica Navarro-Navarro; Francisco Cuéllar-Santiago – Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 2023
The main objective of the research is to study the creative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for writing skills in an educational context. The research aims to provide evidence on the use of AI and contribute to its integration in the classroom as a support for the teaching-learning process. Two types of research designs were established:…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Man Machine Systems, Creativity
Carme Grimalt-Álvaro; Mireia Usart – Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2024
Sentiment Analysis (SA), a technique based on applying artificial intelligence to analyze textual data in natural language, can help to characterize interactions between students and teachers and improve learning through timely, personalized feedback, but its use in education is still scarce. This systematic literature review explores how SA has…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Higher Education, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
Chahna Gonsalves – Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 2023
Multiple-choice quizzes (MCQs) are a popular form of assessment. A rapid shift to online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, drove the uptake of MCQs, yet limited invigilation and wide access to material on the internet allow students to solve the questions via internet search. ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) agent trained on…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing, Multiple Choice Tests
Xiaojing Weng; Qi Xia; Mingyue Gu; Kumaran Rajaram; Thomas K. F. Chiu – Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2024
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) impacts higher education assessment and learning outcomes, which are closely related and intertwined. Literature suggests that educators and researchers have many varied concerns regarding student assessment in the higher education GenAI context, such as how to assess students' learning and the new…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Outcomes of Education, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing
Mike Richards; Kevin Waugh; Mark A Slaymaker; Marian Petre; John Woodthorpe; Daniel Gooch – ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2024
Cheating has been a long-standing issue in university assessments. However, the release of ChatGPT and other free-to-use generative AI tools has provided a new and distinct method for cheating. Students can run many assessment questions through the tool and generate a superficially compelling answer, which may or may not be accurate. We ran a…
Descriptors: Computer Science Education, Artificial Intelligence, Cheating, Student Evaluation
Qi Lu; Yuan Yao; Longhai Xiao; Mingzhu Yuan; Jue Wang; Xinhua Zhu – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
The integration of ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for writing instruction has gained traction. However, uncertainties persist regarding how ChatGPT complements teacher assessment and the overall effectiveness of this combined approach. To address this, we conducted a mixed-methods investigation involving 46 undergraduate students from a research…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Technology, Natural Language Processing, Student Evaluation
Ted M. Clark; Ellie Anderson; Nicole M. Dickson-Karn; Comelia Soltanirad; Nicolas Tafini – Journal of Chemical Education, 2023
Student performance on open-response calculations involving acid and base solutions before and after instruction in general chemistry and analytical chemistry courses was compared with the output from the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT. Applying a theoretical model of expertise for problem solving that includes problem conceptualization,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Students, College Science, Chemistry
McCarthy, Kathryn S.; Allen, Laura K.; Hinze, Scott R. – Grantee Submission, 2020
Open-ended "constructed responses" promote deeper processing of course materials. Further, evaluation of these explanations can yield important information about students' cognition. This study examined how students' constructed responses, generated at different points during learning, relate to their later comprehension outcomes.…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Prediction, Responses, College Students