NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
Higher Education14
Postsecondary Education14
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Jonathan Hoseana; Andy Leonardo Louismono; Oriza Stepanus – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2025
We describe and evaluate a method to mitigate unwanted student collaborations in assessments, which we recently implemented in a second-year undergraduate mathematics module. The method requires a list of specific pairs of students to be prevented from collaborating, which we constructed based on the results of previous assessments. We converted…
Descriptors: Graphs, Color, College Mathematics, Undergraduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Li Zhao; Junjie Peng; Shiqi Ke; Kang Lee – Educational Psychology Review, 2024
Unproctored and teacher-proctored exams have been widely used to prevent cheating at many universities worldwide. However, no empirical studies have directly compared their effectiveness in promoting academic integrity in actual exams. To address this significant gap, in four preregistered field studies, we examined the effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Supervision, Tests, Testing, Integrity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benjamin Sorenson; Kenneth Hanson – Journal of Chemical Education, 2023
In spring 2020, the chemical education community faced an abrupt transition from in-person to online classes, which also necessitated online assessments. Building upon an existing three-semester study (F17, S19, and F19) using Rasch modeling and classical testing theory to improve in-person multiple choice exams, this study investigates the impact…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Chemistry, COVID-19, Pandemics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Gorney, Kylie; Wollack, James A. – Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2022
Unlike the traditional multiple-choice (MC) format, the discrete-option multiple-choice (DOMC) format does not necessarily reveal all answer options to an examinee. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the reduced exposure of item content affects test security. We conducted an experiment in which participants were allowed to view…
Descriptors: Test Items, Test Format, Multiple Choice Tests, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Becker, Benjamin; van Rijn, Peter; Molenaar, Dylan; Debeer, Dries – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2022
A common approach to increase test security in higher educational high-stakes testing is the use of different test forms with identical items but different item orders. The effects of such varied item orders are relatively well studied, but findings have generally been mixed. When multiple test forms with different item orders are used, we argue…
Descriptors: Information Security, High Stakes Tests, Computer Security, Test Items
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bretag, Tracey; Harper, Rowena; Burton, Michael; Ellis, Cath; Newton, Philip; van Haeringen, Karen; Saddiqui, Sonia; Rozenberg, Pearl – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2019
This paper reports on findings from a large Australian research project that explored the relationship between contract cheating and assessment design. Using survey responses from 14,086 students and 1147 educators at eight universities, a multivariate analysis examined the influence of a range of factors on the likelihood that different…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cheating, College Students, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chirumamilla, Aparna; Sindre, Guttorm; Nguyen-Duc, Anh – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
A concern that has been raised with the transition from pen and paper examinations to electronic examinations is whether this will make cheating easier. This article investigates how teachers and students perceive the differences in ease of cheating during three types of written examination: paper exams, bring your own device e-exams and e-exams…
Descriptors: Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing, Test Format, Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Akkaraju, Shylaja – Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2023
To reduce academic dishonesty and strengthen learning outcomes, I adopted in-depth oral examinations as my benchmark and summative assessments in a Human Anatomy & Physiology course taught in an online asynchronous setting. This decision led my students and me down the transformative path of mastery learning. This was a "threshold…
Descriptors: Cheating, Prevention, Oral Language, Test Format
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Lewis, Scott E. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2020
This paper is designed to synopsize the efforts of a team of general chemistry teachers to enact assessments during the abrupt transition to online-only instruction and reflect on what was done successfully and what could be improved. The focus is on the extent remote, online assessments accurately measured student knowledge described within the…
Descriptors: Chemistry, Science Instruction, Online Courses, Distance Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Morales-Martinez, Guadalupe Elizabeth; Lopez-Ramirez, Ernesto Octavio; Mezquita-Hoyos, Yanko Norberto; Lopez-Perez, Rafael; Resendiz, Ana Yolanda Lara – European Journal of Educational Research, 2019
A sample of 327 engineering bachelor students from a public university in Mexico took part in an information integration study to explore systematic thinking underlying propensity for cheating during a course exam. All study participants were provided with written descriptions of 12 scenarios pertaining to the academic evaluation criteria and were…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, Cheating, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Adanir, Gülgün Afacan; Ismailova, Rita; Omuraliev, Asan; Muhametjanova, Gulshat – International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 2020
As online learning is becoming very popular in formal educational settings and in individual development, online exams are starting to be recognized as one of the more efficient assessment methods. Online exams are effective in either blended or traditional forms of learning, and, when appropriately used, bring benefits to both learners and the…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Computer Assisted Testing, Foreign Countries, Developing Nations
Al-Jarf, Reima – Online Submission, 2022
At Saudi universities, there was a sudden shift from face-to-face instruction to distance learning and assessment in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This study explored the status of online exams in language, linguistics, and translation courses in the first two semesters of the Pandemic (Spring 2020 and Fall 2020). Analysis of faculty…
Descriptors: Translation, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Foreign Countries
Wielicki, Tom – International Association for Development of the Information Society, 2016
This paper reports on longitudinal study regarding integrity of testing in an online format as used by e-learning platforms. Specifically, this study explains whether online testing, which implies an open book format is compromising integrity of assessment by encouraging cheating among students. Statistical experiment designed for this study…
Descriptors: Integrity, Online Courses, Statistical Surveys, Longitudinal Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Turner, Charles C. – Journal of Political Science Education, 2005
Rapid growth in the use of internet-based instructional technology (IT) necessitates greater attention to the pedagogical implications of this transition. Though much of the literature on the uses of IT focuses on outcomes and student learning, we also need to ask whether and how different technologies force us to reconceive the boundaries for…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cheating, Student Behavior, Test Format