Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 3 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Source
ProQuest LLC | 2 |
AERA Online Paper Repository | 1 |
Grantee Submission | 1 |
Interactive Learning… | 1 |
Technology, Knowledge and… | 1 |
Author
Albacete, Patricia | 1 |
Ali Darejeh | 1 |
Cutumisu, Maria | 1 |
González-Esparza, Lydia Marion | 1 |
Jessa Henderson | 1 |
Jin, Hao-Yue | 1 |
Jordan, Pamela | 1 |
Katz, Sandra | 1 |
Khue N. Tran | 1 |
Lieven De Marez | 1 |
Lu, Chang | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 2 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 6 |
High Schools | 3 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Belgium | 1 |
Pennsylvania (Pittsburgh) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jessa Henderson – ProQuest LLC, 2024
Algorithms may be better at prediction than humans in a variety of contexts, but they are not perfect. A deeper understanding of the ways in which educators use and question algorithmic advice within their professional domain is needed. Educators are a particularly unique professional group, in comparison with the other groups studied in the…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Literacy, High School Teachers, Science Teachers
Marijn Martens; Ralf De Wolf; Lieven De Marez – Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 2025
Algorithmic decision-making systems such as Learning Analytics (LA) are widely used in an educational setting ranging from kindergarten to university. Most research focuses on how LA is used and adopted by teachers. However, the perspective of students and parents who experience the (in)direct consequences of these systems is underexplored. This…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Decision Making, Learning Analytics, Secondary School Students
Tayebeh Sargazi Moghadam; Ali Darejeh; Mansoureh Delaramifar; Sara Mashayekh – Interactive Learning Environments, 2024
Learners' emotional states might change during the learning process, and unpredictable variations of a person's emotions raise the demand for regular assessment of feelings during learning. In this paper, an AI-based decision framework is proposed and implemented for e-learning systems that identify suitable micro-brake activities based on the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Decision Making, Electronic Learning, Psychological Patterns
González-Esparza, Lydia Marion; Jin, Hao-Yue; Lu, Chang; Cutumisu, Maria – AERA Online Paper Repository, 2022
Detecting wheel-spinning behaviors of students who interact with an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) is important for generating pertinent and effective feedback and developing more enriching learning experiences. This analysis compares decision tree and bagged tree models of student productive persistence (i.e., mastering a skill) using the…
Descriptors: Student Behavior, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Feedback (Response), Persistence
Khue N. Tran – ProQuest LLC, 2022
The main objective of this dissertation was to investigate factors that affect decision-makers' trust in and reliance on algorithmic predictions as decision aids in the context of college admission prediction tasks. College admission officers often made predictions about the applicants' future success based on multiple pieces of available…
Descriptors: Algorithms, College Admission, Prediction, Academic Achievement
Jordan, Pamela; Albacete, Patricia; Katz, Sandra – Grantee Submission, 2016
We explore the effectiveness of a simple algorithm for adaptively deciding whether to further decompose a step in a line of reasoning during tutorial dialogue. We compare two versions of a tutorial dialogue system, Rimac: one that always decomposes a step to its simplest sub-steps and one that adaptively decides to decompose a step based on a…
Descriptors: Algorithms, Decision Making, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)