Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 6 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 7 |
Descriptor
Source
English Language Teaching | 2 |
Cogent Education | 1 |
Instructional Science: An… | 1 |
Journal on English Language… | 1 |
Language Education &… | 1 |
ProQuest LLC | 1 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Reports - Research | 6 |
Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Secondary Education | 7 |
High Schools | 4 |
Grade 11 | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Audience
Location
Iran | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Saudi Arabia | 1 |
Turkey | 1 |
Vietnam | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jochem E. J. Aben; Mayra Mascareño Lara; Anneke C. Timmermans; Filitsa Dingyloudi; Jan-Willem Strijbos – Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2024
Because of the improvement-oriented nature of peer-feedback activities, students have to deal with errors (e.g., spelling and argumentation errors) when providing and processing peer-feedback on writing assignments. Despite the central role of errors in feedback activities, it is uncertain how students deal with errors and whether the dealing with…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Peer Evaluation, Student Attitudes
Chong, Sin Wang – Language Education & Assessment, 2019
In the past decade (2007-2017), research on written corrective feedback (WCF) has been proliferating in English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) and English-as-a-Foreign-Language (EFL) contexts, and new developments in this field of research are evident. To synthesize the latest advancement in WCF research, a systematic review of recent literature on…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Research Design, Writing Assignments, Error Correction
Banaruee, Hassan; Khatin-Zadeh, Omid; Ruegg, Rachael – Cogent Education, 2018
There might always be errors during the learning process which need correction; accordingly, providing corrective feedback is critical. However, the various types of feedback applied during classes affect the learning and teaching process. Teaching and learning could be applied within EFL classes by providing learners with recasts. Recasts have…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), English (Second Language), English Language Learners, High School Students
Tuzcu-Eken, Derya – Journal on English Language Teaching, 2021
The current paper is a mixed method study which aimed to find out teacher written feedback preferences of a group of prep-class students at a public university in Turkey. The written corrective feedback preferences of 37 students with high level of proficiency in English were examined via a questionnaire and an interview. The study lasted for two…
Descriptors: Writing Instruction, Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Qutob, Maysa M.; Madini, Abeer Ahmed – English Language Teaching, 2020
The aim of the current study is to investigate the Saudi English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' preferences for corrective feedback on written assignments. This mixed-method study used a closed-ended Likert scale questionnaire that was adopted and adapted to suit the participants under investigation. Additionally, an open-ended question was…
Descriptors: Error Correction, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language)
Dang, Trang Thi Doan – English Language Teaching, 2016
It has been theoretically and empirically acknowledged that collaborative feedback is beneficial to learning achievement. However, feedback research remains relatively contentious due to learners' differing viewpoints on how feedback is best given. Although a large number of studies have explored learners' perspectives on collaborative feedback,…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Feedback (Response)
Harten, Michael D. – ProQuest LLC, 2014
This study analyzed three analytical essays and three metacognitive reflections written by 36 high school sophomores during one school year. After they had written analytical essays, students wrote reflections in which they described their writing process, explained what they did well, and identified two areas for improvement. The study focused on…
Descriptors: High School Students, Metacognition, Reflection, Self Evaluation (Individuals)