NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Advanced Technology, Inc., Indianapolis, IN. – 1988
This document outlines requirements for evaluating schoolwide projects funded under Title I Chapter 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1975. The following school-level requirements must be met on a school by school basis: (1) demonstrate the aggregate achievement gains of all disadvantaged students in grades 2-12; (2) examine…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Educationally Disadvantaged
Murray, Steve – 1988
The gap-reduction model has been identified as a potential alternative to or extension of the Title I Evaluation and Reporting System (TIERS). The gap-reduction model has been recommended for the evaluation of bilingual programs, but has only recently been given consideration for evaluating local Chapter 1 programs. This report recommends that…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Correlation, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education
Henderson, Allison; And Others – 1992
This report summarizes the participation and achievement information provided by state educational agencies (SEAs) on the Chapter 1 Migrant Education Program (MEP) for 1989-90. Data were obtained through State Performance Reports completed by participating SEAs. The first of four chapters provides an overview of program participation, including…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Quilling, Mary R.; Essl Howard – 1990
This guide focuses on the collection, measurement, and evaluation of data for programs operating under the mandate of Chapter 1 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act. Assessment of compensatory education performance of local education authorities (LEAs) is based on reporting of the following data: (1) basic and advanced skill scores;…
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Compensatory Education, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education
Missouri State Dept. of Elementary and Secondary Education, Jefferson City. – 1993
The need to assess students' educational needs and progress is explored, and minimum standards that local school districts must meet to be in compliance with classification and accreditation standards of the State Board of Education are specified. There are three major uses of assessment results: instructional, guidance and counseling, and…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accreditation (Institutions), Classification, Compensatory Education