NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 2 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lambert, Nadine M.; Hartsough, Carolyn S. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980
Later scholastic success is most highly related to early measures of achievement, affective status, and underperformance; affective status significantly predicts later social adjustment. Thus, neither poverty nor low achievement, both currently favored as Title I allocation criteria, should be used as sole indicators of need. (CP)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Criteria, Educationally Disadvantaged
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Carmichael, Paul H. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1997
The pattern of federal funding allocated through Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was examined for all New York State public schools. The program is widely distributed, with a majority of all schools receiving Title I funding. Some poor schools, especially in urban areas, may be unable to qualify because of this spreading out…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Finance, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Aid