Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| GOODMAN, RICHARD H. | 4 |
| WILSON, MICHAEL J. | 4 |
| ABT, CLARK C. | 1 |
| Anderson, Janice K. | 1 |
| Brown, Edward K. | 1 |
| CARTON, AARON S. | 1 |
| CLARK, ANN D. | 1 |
| Chuang, Ying C. | 1 |
| Davidoff, Stephen H. | 1 |
| Eberle, Francis | 1 |
| Enoki, Donald Y. | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 8 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 5 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
| New York (New York) | 7 |
| Ohio (Cincinnati) | 3 |
| Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) | 3 |
| New York | 2 |
| Ohio | 2 |
| Connecticut | 1 |
| Maine | 1 |
| New Mexico | 1 |
| Oregon | 1 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 |
| Rhode Island | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 48 |
| Education Amendments 1974 | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textFairman, Janet; Johnson, Amy; Eberle, Francis – Center for Education Policy, Applied Research, and Evaluation, 2017
Part I summarizes key topics of federal education policy articulating accountability requirements for state education agencies (SEAs) and local education agencies (LEAs, or school districts). In that section we describe major goals of the legislation and which components are the same or changed in the federal law. The findings are grouped into…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Accountability, State Departments of Education
1967
PROJECT AND PROGRAM EVALUATION REPRESENT TWO BROAD STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION. PRODUCT EVALUATION OF A PROJECT DETERMINES THE EXTENT TO WHICH OBJECTIVES ARE ACHIEVED. THE EVALUATOR'S ATTENTION IS FOCUSED ON CHANGE IN THE TARGET PUPIL OR SCHOOL ON A PRE-PROJECT TO A POST-PROJECT BASIS. IN THEIR EVALUATION OF THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION…
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Aid, Program Evaluation
Pittsburgh Public Schools, PA. – 1967
This conference report presents the position taken by large cities in evaluating projects under ESEA Title I. Since this was the first educational legislation in history to call for evaluation at the local level of programs generated by Federal funds, most districts had little time to design project evaluation and to obtain adequate research…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Peer reviewedPellegrini, A.D.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated two variance estimation procedures on a normed test treated as a criterion-referenced test. The first estimation procedure estimated the standard deviation systematically higher, whereas the second procedure's estimation was systematically lower than the actual standard deviation. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Credibility, Criterion Referenced Tests, Disadvantaged Youth, Educationally Disadvantaged
PDF pending restorationChuang, Ying C.; Theimer, William C. – 1970
The problem of educational evaluation, the various types of evaluation, and the different kinds of models of evaluation systems are discussed in some detail. The educational needs of the students, staff, community, and the Philadelphia Title I schools, as agreed by members of the evaluation team, are listed. A taxonomy of Title I evaluation is…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Sundberg, Barbara J.; Stayrook, Nick – 1998
This report presents results from a 3-year evaluation of the Title I "Success for All" (SFA) schoolwide program being implemented at four elementary schools in the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District, Alaska. SFA meets the criteria of Title I regulations and has a strong reading component with frequent assessments of student…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Elementary Education
KENYON, RAYMOND G. – 1966
THIS REPORT CONTAINS THE RESULTS OF A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF TITLE I PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. A QUESTIONNAIRE REQUESTED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION--NAME OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, TYPE OF PROJECT (CURRICULUM, MULTIMEDIA, STUDENT-PERSONNEL SERVICES, ADMINISTRATIVE, OR OTHER), NUMBER OF PUPILS SERVED,…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
Harvey, James J.; Hill, Paul T. – 1977
This National Institute of Education (NIE) study of compensatory education, and evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I is a response to congressional evaluation needs. The report traces the origin of Title I and the congressional interest in its evaluation. Prior efforts to assess the effectiveness of Title I, congressional…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
HARSH, J. RICHARD – 1967
APPRAISALS OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY ACT PROGRAMS SHOULD BE MADE IN TERMS OF (1) A PROGRAM'S STATED PURPOSES, (2) A BEHAVIORIAL DEFINITION OF PROGRAM OBJECTIVES, (3) THE SITUATIONS AND EXPERIENCES THROUGH WHICH THE OBJECTIVES ARE TO BE ACHIEVED, (4) DATA COLLECTED BY APPROPRIATE INSTRUMENTS TO MEASURE THE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES, AND (5) DATA…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Analysis, Data Collection, Disadvantaged Youth
CARTON, AARON S. – 1966
THE QUALITY, FEASIBILITY, AND APPROPRIATENESS OF A NONPUBLIC DAY SCHOOL SPEECH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM WERE ASSESSED. EVALUATIONS OF THE RESULTS OF THE PROGRAM WERE BASED ON PUPIL PROGRESS REPORTS, OBSERVED SPEECH IMPROVEMENT, AND RESPONSES TO STAFF QUESTIONNAIRES. SOME DIFFICULTY WAS ENCOUNTERED IN MEASURING THE IMPACT OF THE PROGRAM ON PUPIL SPEECH…
Descriptors: Disadvantaged Youth, Economically Disadvantaged, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Kennedy, Mary – 1980
The topics discussed in this resource book include not only how to assess the long-term impact of early childhood Title I programs, but also how to develop and use a longitudinal information system for a variety of routine operations. The book is designed to help evaluators decide what a particular information system should look like. For…
Descriptors: Data Collection, Disadvantaged Youth, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods
JACOBS, JAMES N.; AND OTHERS – 1967
THE EFFECT WHICH THE FIRST YEAR OF VARIOUS ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT (ESEA) TITLE I COMPENSATORY EDUCATION PROJECTS HAS HAD ON A DISADVANTAGED POPULATION IN CINCINNATI IS REPORTED IN THIS EVALUATION. THE EVALUATORS HYPOTHESIZED THAT THE MOST DRAMATIC RESULTS WOULD OCCUR IN SCHOOLS WHICH RECEIVED THE MOST INTENSIVE TREATMENT. IN THE…
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, Annual Reports, Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth
Nairus, John P. – 1976
The original requirement for evaluation in Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was unprecedented. However, the wording and intent of the requirement was purposely left vague because of the conflict between the schoolman's concern over federal interference and Congress' demands for feedback that could lead to efficient…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation
ABT, CLARK C. – 1966
SEVEN SEPARATE REPORTS DESCRIBE AN OVERVIEW OF A COST-EFFECTIVENESS MODEL AND FIVE SUBMODELS FOR EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY ACT TITLE I PROPOSALS. THE DESIGN FOR THE MODEL ATTEMPTS A QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION OF EDUCATION SYSTEMS WHICH MAY BE PROGRAMED AS A COMPUTER SIMULATION TO INDICATE THE IMPACT OF A TITLE I…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Community Change, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods
Pennsylvania State Dept. of Public Instruction, Harrisburg. – 1966
PRESENTED ARE GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF PROGRAMS FUNDED IN THE PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOLS UNDER TITLE I OF THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT. SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED ARE GUIDELINES FOR THE LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES TO USE IN REPORTING THE MEASURING INSTRUMENTS AND EVALUATION TECHNIQUES USED IN THE EVALUATIONS AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Disadvantaged Youth, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs
