Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Society for Research on… | 1 |
Author
Anderson, Judith I. | 1 |
Cech, Joseph | 1 |
Coffey, Deb | 1 |
Crane, Laura R. | 1 |
Estes, Gary D. | 1 |
Faddis, Bonnie | 1 |
Hamilton, Jennifer | 1 |
Loadman, William | 1 |
Sprague, Kim | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Massachusetts | 1 |
New Jersey | 1 |
Ohio | 1 |
Oregon | 1 |
Tennessee | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 3 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Stanford Diagnostic Reading… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sprague, Kim; Hamilton, Jennifer; Coffey, Deb; Loadman, William; Faddis, Bonnie – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2009
Rigorous research provides information that will allow other schools and districts to select interventions that have a scientifically based track record of effectiveness. All Striving Reader grants include the mandate to evaluate literacy intervention(s) targeted to adolescents who are reading significantly below grade level. Although all studies…
Descriptors: Conferences (Gatherings), Evaluators, Program Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods
Estes, Gary D.; Anderson, Judith I. – 1978
An empirical study was conducted in order to obtain treatment effect estimates with the Special Regression model for groups in which there was no treatment. General mathematics test scores were obtained from 730 ninth graders in city schools somewhat similar to Title I schools, but in which no special treatments were given. Hypothetical…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Arithmetic, Compensatory Education, Control Groups
Crane, Laura R.; Cech, Joseph – 1979
Normal curve equivalent achievement gains estimates were compared with RMC Title I evaluation Models A1 and B1. The comparison focused upon the amount of bias introduced by Model A1 when its underlying assumptions were violated. The model assumes, first, that the local school population is accurately represented by the national norm group; and…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Control Groups, Early Childhood Education