Descriptor
Source
Author
| Bunch, Michael B. | 1 |
| Horst, Donald P. | 1 |
| Shapiro, Madelaine | 1 |
| Strand, Theresa | 1 |
| Strum, Irene | 1 |
| Tallmadge, G. Kasten | 1 |
Publication Type
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 4 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 4 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Metropolitan Readiness Tests | 1 |
| SRA Achievement Series | 1 |
| Woodcock Reading Mastery Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Strum, Irene; Shapiro, Madelaine – 1980
The purpose of this study was to validate the Prescriptive Instructional Program for Educational Readiness (PIPER) for utilization as a criterion referenced test (CRT) among learning disabled children. The program consisted of behavioral objectives and diagnostic and/or mastery tasks and activities for each objective in the area of gross motor…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Learning Disabilities, Primary Education
Bunch, Michael B. – 1982
Research evidence relating to the utility of the RMC evaluation models of compensatory education employing non-normed tests is examined. The history and evolution of five early models into the current norm-referenced model utilizing a non-normed test (Model A2), non-normed versions of a comparison model (Model B2), and the regression model (Model…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Correlation, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Strand, Theresa; And Others – 1979
Use of the Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests (WRMT), individually administered wide ranging reading tests, was explored, using Title I evaluation Models A1 and A2. Attention was focused on: (1) relationship of the Title I curriculum to the WRMT and the SRA Reading Test; (2) comparative reading achievement gains on both tests, using Model A1; and (3)…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Compensatory Education, Content Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests
Tallmadge, G. Kasten; Horst, Donald P. – 1978
In this discussion of the use of achievement tests in evaluating Title I programs, matching content between test and curriculum is the main theme. The point is made that unless a test measures what is taught, it cannot be sensitive to whatever gains the instruction produces. Thus, if different instructional treatments have different objectives, it…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Compensatory Education, Content Analysis


