Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Constitutional Law | 3 |
| Court Litigation | 3 |
| Equal Protection | 3 |
| Civil Rights | 2 |
| Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
| Courts | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Fees | 1 |
| Freedom of Information | 1 |
| Freedom of Speech | 1 |
| Justice | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Essex, Nathan L. | 1 |
| Zirkel, Perry A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
| New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 3 |
| Fourteenth Amendment | 1 |
| United States Constitution | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Zirkel, Perry A. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2005
On 26 September 2001, the Chino Valley School District, which is approximately 30 miles east of Los Angeles, signed a negotiated agreement with the duly authorized union representing the certified employees, the Associated Chino Teachers (ACT). The agreement provided that every member of the represented unit would become either a member of the ACT…
Descriptors: Religion, Equal Protection, Court Litigation, Constitutional Law
American Newspaper Publishers Association Foundation, Washington, DC. – 1987
In relation to law enforcement and the courts, the press serves to inform the public about crimes and how government institutions deal with them. The press also plays a crucial role in assuring that the rights of individuals guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment are protected. The issue of prejudice, caused by news coverage of crime and criminal…
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Courts
Peer reviewed
Direct linkEssex, Nathan L. – Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2006
This article address the legal and constitutional issues surrounding how far school leaders can go in restricting distribution of materials that are viewed as religious in nature. Does restricting the student's right to distribute the flyer amount to a suppression of free speech based on content? Does the principal's action constitute unlawful…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Public Schools, Student Rights, Principals
