Descriptor
| Censorship | 2 |
| Court Litigation | 2 |
| Freedom of Speech | 2 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Audience Analysis | 1 |
| Board of Education Role | 1 |
| Civil Liberties | 1 |
| Court Role | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| Freedom of Information | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Communication Education | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| First Amendment | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textLipschultz, Jeremy Harris – 1988
The United States Supreme Court case, Meese v. Keene, in which the justices narrowly defined the meaning of the term "political propaganda," failed to address adequately the complexities of the issue. In this case it is necessary to bring together divergent views about communications in the analysis of the legal problem, including…
Descriptors: Audience Analysis, Censorship, Court Litigation, Court Role
Peer reviewedSiegel, Paul – Communication Education, 1987
Argues that the Supreme Court's decision--upholding the constitutionality of disciplinary actions taken against a public high school student who delivered a speech laden with sexual metaphor (though not obscene language) in a nominating assembly--was improper in that it attempted to articulate a false dichotomy between "political…
Descriptors: Administrators, Board of Education Role, Censorship, Civil Liberties
