Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Data Analysis | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Scores | 2 |
| Special Needs Students | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Alignment (Education) | 1 |
| Alternative Assessment | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Charter Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Adult Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Delaware | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
| Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkPalucci, Doreen Mone – ProQuest LLC, 2010
No Child Left Behind mandates have given teachers new responsibilities in data analysis and the implementation of strategies that meet individual student needs. Providing tools and methods for data collection, managing it, and then analyzing it is now a basic need for teachers. By aligning assessments for the specific purpose of addressing…
Descriptors: Student Needs, Charter Schools, Federal Legislation, Formative Evaluation
Peer reviewedPullin, Diana – Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 2005
Current national efforts at education reform rely largely on the use of standardized testing, the cornerstone of federal education policy as a result of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001, with its requirements for regular testing of all students and demonstrations of adequate yearly progress on tests by all schools. The challenges…
Descriptors: Testing Programs, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
