Descriptor
Source
Journal of College and… | 3 |
American Business Law Journal | 1 |
Creighton Law Review | 1 |
Loyola Law Review | 1 |
Seton Hall Law Review | 1 |
Washburn Law Journal | 1 |
Author
Bodner, Gerald A. | 1 |
Finkin, Matthew W. | 1 |
Johnson, Roberta R. | 1 |
Kegelman, Joan B. | 1 |
Lee, Barbara A. | 1 |
Pagano, Philip G. | 1 |
Sabalot, Deborah A. | 1 |
Twomey, David P. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 8 |
Legal/Legislative/Regulatory… | 8 |
Opinion Papers | 8 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
National Labor Relations… | 8 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Pagano, Philip G. – Creighton Law Review, 1981
Previous faculty National Labor Relations Board status decisions are analyzed to discern the rationale behind the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to follow prior holdings of the Board. The Board can now either set a procedure for determining faculty status or declare faculty protected, forcing Congress to address the issue directly. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Federal Legislation

Finkin, Matthew W. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
Viewed from the perspective of administrative law, labor law, or just higher education, the Yeshiva decision does not make sense. It would be appropriate in future litigation to compel the court to do what it refused to do here, that is to address the extent to which the industrial analogy applies to colleges and universities. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty, Court Litigation

Twomey, David P. – American Business Law Journal, 1981
A congressional amendment to the National Labor Relations Act appears to be the most viable means of providing faculty members the bargaining rights held by all other professionals in this country, after the Yeshiva University decision. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Faculty Workload
Johnson, Roberta R. – Washburn Law Journal, 1980
By acknowledging a specific setting, as at Yeshiva University, where faculty are legally considered managerial, the court lays a foundation on which private colleges may attempt to build, by trying to fit the "mature" governing structure outlined in the court decision. Journal available from the School of Law, Washburn University,…
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Higher Education

Lee, Barbara A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
The Yeshiva decision shows that several actions must be taken to clarify or resolve issues: several legal terms must be redefined, more comprehensive fact-finding is needed, and higher education collective bargaining must be better understood to distinguish faculty governance roles more clearly. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty, Court Litigation
Sabalot, Deborah A. – Loyola Law Review, 1980
It is submitted that, in the court decision on Yeshiva University and collective bargaining, the court failed to provide the National Labor Relations Board with any clear guidelines for applying its managerial context test. The decision's consistency with the National Labor Relations Act's intent is questioned. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrators, Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation

Kegelman, Joan B. – Seton Hall Law Review, 1980
The exclusion of faculty members as managerial employees may seriously disadvantage all professional employees, the very group the National Labor Relations Act was amended to protect. (Journal availability: Dennis & Company, 251 Main St., Buffalo, NY 14203.) (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty, Constitutional Law

Bodner, Gerald A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
Amidst widely disparate predictions as to the effect the Yeshiva decision will have in higher education, traditional legal wisdom would suggest awaiting further NLRB and court decisions for guidance on Yeshiva's impact on different institutions, especially given the various existing and potential unionization arrangements. (MSE)
Descriptors: Collective Bargaining, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Employer Employee Relationship