Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Author
Adkins, Deborah | 1 |
Andal, Jolynne | 1 |
Brown, Kevin | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Kettler, Ryan J. | 1 |
Kingsbury, G. Gage | 1 |
McDonald, Sarah-Kathryn | 1 |
Schneider, Barbara | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
Indiana | 3 |
Arizona | 2 |
Idaho | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Michigan | 2 |
Minnesota | 2 |
Ohio | 2 |
Wisconsin | 2 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
Indiana Statewide Testing for… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kettler, Ryan J. – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2011
The final regulations of the "No Child Left Behind" Act (U.S. Department of Education, 2007a, 2007b) indicate that a small group of students with disabilities can be counted as proficient through an alternate assessment based on modified academic achievement standards. This new policy gives individualized education program teams the…
Descriptors: Alternative Assessment, Computer Assisted Testing, Disabilities, Testing Accommodations
McDonald, Sarah-Kathryn; Andal, Jolynne; Brown, Kevin; Schneider, Barbara – Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest, 2007
Educational improvement through data-based decision-making using high-quality data is a longstanding goal of policymakers and practitioners, and ensuring the quality of the evidence available to inform such decisions is a key part of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The evidence-based education that such initiatives promote involves the…
Descriptors: Educational Resources, Information Needs, Information Systems, Politics of Education
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests