Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 4 | 1 |
| Grade 8 | 1 |
Audience
Location
| New York | 3 |
| Colorado | 1 |
| Kentucky | 1 |
| Maryland | 1 |
| Massachusetts | 1 |
| Minnesota | 1 |
| Missouri | 1 |
| New Jersey | 1 |
| New Mexico | 1 |
| Oklahoma | 1 |
| Tennessee | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| New York State Regents… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKoyama, Jill P. – Educational Policy, 2012
This article ethnographically examines the paradoxical situation in which one high-achieving New York City public school is "constructed" as failing when No Child Left Behind (NCLB) assessments are miscalculated. Drawing upon actor-network theory (ANT)--a perspective that aims to explain how people, their ideas, and the material objects…
Descriptors: Public Schools, Educational Policy, Educational Finance, Sanctions
Download full textLe Floch, Kerstin Carlson; Tanenbaum, Courtney – Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, US Department of Education, 2016
The "Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965" ("ESEA") is the nation's key policy driver for elementary and secondary education, shaping federal, state and district efforts to promote effective school systems and improve educational outcomes, particularly for students in high-poverty schools. The most recent…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Policy
Center on Education Policy, 2009
This year the Center on Education Policy (CEP) analyzed data on the achievement of different groups of students in two distinct ways. First, it looked at grade 4 test results to determine whether the performance of various groups improved at three achievement levels--basic and above, proficient and above, and advanced. Second, it looked at gaps…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Low Income, American Indians, African American Students
