Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
| Learning Disability Quarterly | 3 |
Author
| Aro, Mikko T. | 1 |
| Björn, Piia M. | 1 |
| Daves, David P. | 1 |
| Fuchs, Douglas H. | 1 |
| Fuchs, Lynn S. | 1 |
| Koponen, Tuire K. | 1 |
| Walker, David W. | 1 |
| Zirkel, Perry A. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Finland | 1 |
| United States | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 3 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
| Education for All Handicapped… | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Program for International… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkZirkel, Perry A. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2012
In this issue of "Learning Disability Quarterly" (LDQ), Professors Daves and Walker reply to my earlier LDQ article on confusion in the cases and commentary about the legal dimension of RTI. In this brief rejoinder, I show that their reply confirms rather than resolves the confusion in their original commentary in 2010. This persistent…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Court Litigation, Response to Intervention, Federal Legislation
Björn, Piia M.; Aro, Mikko T.; Koponen, Tuire K.; Fuchs, Lynn S.; Fuchs, Douglas H. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2016
Response to intervention (RTI) can be considered an everyday practice in many parts of the United States, whereas, in Finland, only recently has a new framework for support in learning taken shape. Choosing Finland as the comparative partner for this policy paper is justified as its educational system has been widely referenced on the basis of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Response to Intervention, Special Education, International Assessment
Daves, David P.; Walker, David W. – Learning Disability Quarterly, 2012
Professional confusion, as well as case law confusion, exists concerning the fidelity and integrity of response to intervention (RTI) as a defensible procedure for identifying children as having a specific learning disability (SLD) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Division is generated because of conflicting mandates…
Descriptors: Learning Disabilities, Response to Intervention, Integrity, Fidelity
