Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Academic Achievement | 2 |
| Class Size | 2 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Gap | 1 |
| Case Studies | 1 |
| Charter Schools | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Educational Improvement | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Achilles, C. M. | 1 |
| Yeh, Stuart S. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
| Books | 1 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkYeh, Stuart S. – IAP - Information Age Publishing, Inc., 2011
As a consequence of the federal "No Child Left Behind" (NCLB) law, there is tremendous pressure on school principals, teachers, school superintendents, district staff, state departments of education and governors to maximize the increase in student achievement that is obtained with every dollar of expenditure. Currently, teachers are…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Social Influences, Cost Effectiveness
Peer reviewed
Download full textAchilles, C. M. – Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, 2005
Class size reduction has been shown to, among other things, improve academic achievement for all students and particularly for low-income and minority students. With the No Child Left Behind Act's heavy emphasis on scientifically based research, adequate yearly progress, and disaggregated results, one wonders why all children aren't enrolled in…
Descriptors: Class Size, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
