Descriptor
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Cost Effectiveness | 1 |
| Dependents | 1 |
| Error Patterns | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Family Characteristics | 1 |
| Federal Aid | 1 |
| Financial Aid Applicants | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Income | 1 |
| Mathematical Models | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
| Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Pell Grant Program | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textAdvanced Technology, Inc., Reston, VA. – 1982
The development of a number of error-prone models to select Pell Grant recipients for validation is discussed. The 1983-1984 Pell Grant validation strategy consists of a two-stage approach: selection using Pre-Established Criteria (PEC) followed by selection using Error Prone Modeling (EPM). The database used for model development consists of a…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Dependents, Error Patterns
