Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Program Implementation | 3 |
Accountability | 2 |
Case Studies | 2 |
Federal Legislation | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Barriers | 1 |
Compliance (Legal) | 1 |
Computer Uses in Education | 1 |
Data | 1 |
Data Analysis | 1 |
Educational Change | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Missouri | 3 |
California | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
New York | 1 |
Ohio | 1 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Race to the Top | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Family Educational Rights and… | 1 |
Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Pennington, Kaitlin – Center for American Progress, 2014
In 2011, President Barack Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan provided states with an opportunity for flexibility from certain requirements under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, or ESEA, currently known as the No Child Left Behind, or NCLB, Act. A total of 43 states; Washington, D.C.; Puerto Rico; and eight districts in…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Teacher Evaluation
Robins, Jennifer; Antrim, Patricia – School Library Research, 2012
Response to Intervention (RtI) is a three-tiered model of instruction that increases learning for all students. RtI meets the requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act to provide research-based instruction and interventions for students as needed. RtI is supported with federal funds from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and…
Descriptors: Librarians, School Libraries, Response to Intervention, Federal Legislation
Tucker, Bill – Education Sector, 2010
Over the past decade, school districts and states have made impressive advances in collecting and managing data used for accountability purposes. By the year 2011, all 50 states will have systems to track students from year to year. But in most states and districts, all the data generated by these systems flows only one way: up. This paper…
Descriptors: Evidence, Educational Objectives, Outcomes of Education, Educational Change