Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Cutting Scores | 2 |
Data Analysis | 2 |
Instructional Program… | 2 |
Test Validity | 2 |
Academic Standards | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Articulation (Education) | 1 |
Behavior Problems | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Data Use | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Adkins, Deborah | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Kandace Fleming | 1 |
Kathleen Lynne Lane | 1 |
Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton | 1 |
Kingsbury, G. Gage | 1 |
Mark Matthew Buckman | 1 |
Nathan Allen Lane | 1 |
Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 2 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 2 |
Kansas | 2 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
Massachusetts | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Child Behavior Checklist | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kathleen Lynne Lane; Nathan Allen Lane; Mark Matthew Buckman; Katie Scarlett Lane Pelton; Kandace Fleming; Rebecca E. Swinburne Romine – Behavioral Disorders, 2025
We report the results of a convergent validity study examining the externalizing subscale (SRSS-E5, five items) of the adapted Student Risk Screening Scale for Internalizing and Externalizing (SRSS-IE 9) with the externalizing subscale of the Teacher Report Form (TRF) with two samples of K-12 students. Results of logistic regression and receiver…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Decision Making, Data Use, Test Validity
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Adkins, Deborah; Kingsbury, G. Gage – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2007
At the heart of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is the call for all students to be "proficient" in reading and mathematics by 2014. Yet the law expects each state to define proficiency as it sees fit and design its own tests. This study investigated three research questions related to this policy: (1) How consistent are various…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Mathematics Tests, Test Validity, Reading Tests