Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Author
Barber, Rebecca | 1 |
Cronin, John | 1 |
Dahlin, Michael | 1 |
Garcia, David R. | 1 |
Maranto, Robert | 1 |
McCahon, Donna | 1 |
Milliman, Scott | 1 |
Molnar, Alex | 1 |
Xiang, Yun | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 3 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 3 | 2 |
Grade 4 | 2 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Grade 6 | 2 |
Grade 7 | 2 |
Grade 8 | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 4 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
Delaware | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Idaho | 1 |
Illinois | 1 |
Indiana | 1 |
Kansas | 1 |
Maine | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Milliman, Scott; Maranto, Robert – Journal of School Choice, 2009
The U.S. charter school movement has expanded rapidly, but this growth is geographically uneven at the school district level. Focusing on Arizona--which has the least restrictive charter school law in the United States--we use district variables to determine the factors driving charter market share in 41 districts. Included in our analysis is an…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Job Satisfaction, School Districts, Educational Indicators
Garcia, David R.; Barber, Rebecca; Molnar, Alex – Teachers College Record, 2009
Background/Context: Nationally, almost a quarter of charter school students attend a school managed by a for-profit education management organization (EMO). EMOs have full executive authority over the operation and management of schools, including curriculum and instruction decisions. Because charter schools are funded with public dollars, critics…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Charter Schools, Academic Achievement, Educational Practices
Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states submit accountability plans to the U.S. Department of Education detailing the rules and…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs