Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Attention Control | 3 |
Cues | 3 |
Foreign Countries | 3 |
Reaction Time | 3 |
Cognitive Processes | 2 |
Prompting | 2 |
Spatial Ability | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Color | 1 |
Experimental Psychology | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Folk, Charles L. | 2 |
Remington, Roger W. | 2 |
Becker, Stefanie I. | 1 |
Irons, Jessica L. | 1 |
Sewell, David K. | 1 |
Smith, Philip L. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Australia | 3 |
Pennsylvania | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Irons, Jessica L.; Folk, Charles L.; Remington, Roger W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2012
Although models of visual search have often assumed that attention can only be set for a single feature or property at a time, recent studies have suggested that it may be possible to maintain more than one attentional control setting. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether spatial attention could be guided by multiple attentional…
Descriptors: Attention Control, Spatial Ability, Color, Priming
Sewell, David K.; Smith, Philip L. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2012
The attention literature distinguishes two general mechanisms by which attention can benefit performance: gain (or resource) models and orienting (or switching) models. In gain models, processing efficiency is a function of a spatial distribution of capacity or resources; in orienting models, an attentional spotlight must be aligned with the…
Descriptors: Reaction Time, Attention Control, Experimental Psychology, Visual Stimuli
Becker, Stefanie I.; Folk, Charles L.; Remington, Roger W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
On the contingent capture account, top-down attentional control settings restrict involuntary attentional capture to items that match the features of the search target. Attention capture is involuntary, but contingent on goals and intentions. The observation that only target-similar items can capture attention has usually been taken to show that…
Descriptors: Attention Control, Cognitive Processes, Prompting, Cues