Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Data Interpretation | 2 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 2 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Comparative Education | 1 |
| Course Evaluation | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Birks, Melanie | 1 |
| Harrison, Glenn | 1 |
| Hitchins, Marnie | 1 |
| Nair, Chenicheri Sid | 1 |
| Smithson, John | 1 |
| Williams, Ross | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Australia | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSmithson, John; Birks, Melanie; Harrison, Glenn; Nair, Chenicheri Sid; Hitchins, Marnie – Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective, 2015
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine current approaches to interpretation of student evaluation data and present an innovative approach to developing benchmark targets for the effective and efficient use of these data. Design/Methodology/Approach: This article discusses traditional approaches to gathering and using student feedback…
Descriptors: Benchmarking, Data, Evaluation Utilization, College Students
Download full textWilliams, Ross – Australian Universities' Review, 2008
University rankings are having a profound effect on both higher education systems and individual universities. In this paper we outline these effects, discuss the desirable characteristics of a good ranking methodology and document existing practice, with an emphasis on the two main international rankings (Shanghai Jiao Tong and THES-QS). We take…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Evaluation Criteria, Classification, Comparative Analysis
