Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Rating | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| Anatomy | 1 |
| Benchmarking | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Dissertations/Theses -… | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Grade 10 | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSaxena, Varun; Natarajan, Pradeep; O'Sullivan, Patricia S.; Jain, Sharad – Anatomical Sciences Education, 2008
Medical schools have reduced the time allotted to anatomy instruction. Consequently, schools engage students in more independent settings using information and communication technologies (ICT). There has been limited research in the use of video aids, a type of ICT, to enhance anatomy examination performance. The objective of this study is to…
Descriptors: Video Technology, Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Medical Students
Download full textPeariso, Jamon F. – Online Submission, 2006
The purpose of this literature review and Ex Post Facto descriptive study was to determine which type of benchmark assessment, multiple-choice or project-based, provides the best indication of general success on the history portion of the CST (California Standards Tests). The result of the study indicates that although the project-based benchmark…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Benchmarking, History Instruction, Standardized Tests
