Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Orthographic Symbols | 1 |
| Reading Processes | 1 |
| Recall (Psychology) | 1 |
| Semantics | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| Task Analysis | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Scientific Studies of Reading | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMartin-Chang, Sandra; Levesque, Kyle – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2015
The majority of naturalistic reading occurs within passages. Therefore, it is important to understand how reading in context affects the division of labor between semantic and orthographic processing. However, it is difficult to compare the cognitive processes elicited by reading in context and lists because of the perceptual differences that…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Undergraduate Students, Reading Processes, Context Effect
