Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Color | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Interference (Learning) | 1 |
| Reaction Time | 1 |
| Short Term Memory | 1 |
| Visual Stimuli | 1 |
Source
| Journal of Experimental… | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stroop Color Word Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSpinelli, Giacomo; Krishna, Kesheni; Perry, Jason R.; Lupker, Stephen J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2020
A consistent finding in the Stroop literature is that congruency effects (i.e., the color-naming latency difference between words presented in incongruent vs. congruent colors) are larger for mostly-congruent items (e.g., the word RED presented most often in red) than for mostly-incongruent items (e.g., the word GREEN presented most often in…
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Color
